search for: proc2

...ot;win32/process" proc1 = Process.create(:app_name => "C:\Program Files (x86)\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe about:blank") Process.kill 9, proc1.process_id # works proc1 = Process.create(:app_name => "C:\Program Files (x86)\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe about:blank") proc2 = Process.create(:app_name => "C:\Program Files (x86)\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe about:blank") Process.kill 9, proc2.process_id # doesn''t work because the proc2.process_id doesn''t exist anymore Any ideas why the proc2 process_id will not exist right after startin...

...1988 and columns "proc1"-"proc3" contain the values 56.36 or 59.81. My pathetic solution to do this in R currently looks like this: vaslinks4$treat <- 0 vaslinks4$treat[vaslinks4$yearsep < 1988 && (vaslinks4$proc1 %in% c(56.36,59.81) || vaslinks4$proc2 %in% c(56.36,59.81) || vaslinks4$proc3 %in% c(56.36,59.81))] <- 1 But I'm sure there is a more elegant solution for this, in which I would not have to call all three columns separately. Anyone? Yours Joanne Solution in SPSS: COMPUTE treat=0. FORMATS treat (F1). DO REPEAT...

...turn true end The serious problem with implementing this is that in Ruby 1.8.6 proc equality occurs at the syntax/parser tree level, so this spec would fail: describe "Two procs" do it "should be equal with the same bodies" do @proc1 = lambda { do_something } @proc2 = lambda { do_something } @proc1.should == @proc2 end end Any good thoughts on how to get around this? Scott

Hi, I am tracking down a problem and would like to know how I can follow a forked process with my dtrace script, or how I can trace a dynamic library. Here is the problem. I am tracing dtlogin, and specifically I am trying to determine what error libpkcs11`<routine> is returning. It turns out dtlogin forks a lot of processes, and I believe the second forked process is the one that winds

...nosis. ID(200 patients)   Diag (100 unique Diag-200 in general)   Proc (50 uniqe Proc)  DOB (200)   Gender (200)    a                           daig1 b                           diag2 c                            diag1 I want to reformat this data to : ID   diag1 diag 2 diag 3..  diagx   proc1   proc2   proc3... procx  DOB  Gender a1011  20F Thanks a lot for your help and time.   Best,Farnoosh Sheikhi [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello R-Community, I have the following matching problem: I have two data.frames, one with an observation every month (per company ID), and one with an observation every quarter (per company ID; note that quarter means fiscal quarter; therefore 1Q = Jan, Feb, Mar is not necessarily correct and also, a fiscal quarter is not necessarily 3 month long). For every month and company, I want to get the

Hi, I am trying to use sub, regexpr on expressions like log(D) ~ log(N)+I(log(N)^2)+log(t) being a model specification. The aim is to produce: "ln D ~ ln N + ln^2 N + ln t" The variable names N, t may change, the number of terms too. I succeded only partially, help on regular expressions is hard to understand for me, examples on my case are rare. The help page on R-help

...:36.70 nfsd # cat /proc/net/rpc/nfsd rc 8872 34768207 38630969 fh 142 0 0 0 0 io 2432226534 884662242 th 32 394 4851.311 2437.416 370.949 238.432 542.241 4.942 2.239 1.000 0.427 0.541 ra 64 3876274 5025 3724 2551 2030 2036 1506 1607 1219 1154 1136249 net 73410453 73261524 0 0 rpc 73408119 0 0 0 0 proc2 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 proc3 22 33 9503937 1315066 11670859 7139862 0 5033349 28129122 3729031 0 0 0 487614 0 1116215 0 0 2054329 21225 66 0 2351744 proc4 2 0 0 proc4ops 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Do you think nfs is the probl...