search for: probing

NAME ID a b c d 1 Control_1 probe~B01R01C01 381 213 345 653 2 Control_2 probe~B01R01C02 574 629 563 783 3 Control_1 probe~B01R09C01 673 511 521 967 4 Control_3 probe~B01R09C02 53 809 999 50 5 MM0289~RFU:11810.15 probe~B29R13C06 681 34 115 587 6 MM0289~RFU:9238.41 probe~B29R13C05 784 443 20 784 7 MM16597~RFU:36765.38 probe~B44R15C20 719 251 790 445 8 MM16597~RFU:41258.94 probe~B44R15C19 677

How do I query an application to see if it supports any USDT probe points?

Hi people, When working with some usdt C++ probes we have come across a few issues. Controlling USDT Function name: Putting in usdt probes into C++ code gives you the mangled enclosing function name for the probes Function name. Working around this can be a pain. You need to wrap your usdt probes in extern C functions and call these. Could we have an option to control the Function name for

Hi, experts for example, the below case: You can see a lot of back and forth MTU probe packets been exchanged between tinc nodes, but it’s weird that, from the debug log, one line shows "No response to MTU probes from node1”, but it indeed received a lot of MTU probe response, and finally it get the conclusion of "Packet for node1 (1.1.1.1 port 443) larger than minimum MTU”.

Referring to the DTrace manual: "Module If this probe corresponds to a specific program location, the name of the module in which the probe is located. This name is either the name of a kernel module or the name of a user library. Function If this probe corresponds to a specific program location, the name of the program function in which the probe is located." and then ...

...rFileFindHugeTLBFS:3734 : this function is not supported by the connection driver: virFileFindHugeTLBFS 2019-07-11 00:12:33.382+0000: 123145573953536: warning : virQEMUCapsInit:919 : Failed to get host CPU cache info 2019-07-11 00:12:33.401+0000: 123145573953536: error : virHostCPUGetTscInfo:1405 : Probing TSC is not supported on this platform: Function not implemented 2019-07-11 00:12:33.401+0000: 123145573953536: error : virExec:521 : Cannot find 'pm-is-supported' in path: No such file or directory 2019-07-11 00:12:33.401+0000: 123145573953536: warning : virQEMUCapsInit:926 : Failed to get...

Hi, I am adding DTrace probes within NFS v3 client. In my current implementation, I use some tsd_*() functions and kmem_zalloc() function. These functions might be heavy and affect the performance. I want to call this function only when DTrace is running or the DTrace probes are enable. So is there a way to check DTrace is running or DTrace probe is enabled? Regards, Danhua

...#39;'pid$target::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry'' -c python dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid$target::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry: probe description pid59706::PyEval_EvalFrameEx:entry does not match any probes These functions show up in ustack()s, but they do not appear to be available for probing. There do not appear to be any probes in the "a.out" module: $ sudo dtrace -n ''pid$target:a.out::entry'' -c python dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid$target:a.out::entry: probe description pid59714:python::entry does not match any probes I suspect that part of the re...

I added a couple of static probes to Firefox to measure actual work done. I could have used a pid$target probe with a function name but work is done within an if statement, which is where I placed the static probes. I''m wondering about my use, though. Is the following significantly more efficient than pid$target::FunName:entry and return? I heard somewhere that $target does not

Hi All, I''ve got a problem when I have USDT probes in a static library and in the application code outside of the library. I build the static library containing some USDT probes, glomming everything together (ld -r) before creating the .a file to preserve the probe symbols. This all works fine. I build an application which also has some USDT probes. When I build the application which

[Perhaps someone could rename this list to dtrace-matt-problems-discuss?] If I run this script against my binary (which contains a USDT probe called ''concurrentq-latency''): ::: / probename == "concurrentq-latency" / { printf("[%s]:[%s]:[%s]\n", probeprov, probefunc, probename); } I get this output: dtrace: script ''testq.d'' matched 46056

I found the server(1.1.1.1) didn’t receive the MTU probe from client, so I add iptables -A INPUT -p udp —port 443 -j ACCEPT. After this, I see one packet matching on the server side, and the MTU negotiation works, but when I tear down the tinc, and re-establish the tinc connection, the counter of below UDP/443 never increase, and also my other tinc nodes never add this statement on iptables, but

I have found that pid provider can not create memcpy:return probe for 64bit process on snv_110. For example, the pid is 10603, I will have following output for dtrace command: #dtrace -n pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return: probe description pid10603:libc.so.1:memcpy:return does not match any probes This just

Hi group, This is how my test file looks like: Chr start end sample1 sample2 chr2 9896633 9896683 0 0 chr2 9896639 9896690 0 0 chr2 14314039 14314098 0 -0.35 chr2 14404467 14404502 0 -0.35 chr2 14421718 14421777 -0.43 -0.35 chr2 16031710 16031769 -0.43 -0.35 chr2 16036178 16036237 -0.43 -0.35 chr2 16048665 16048724 -0.43 -0.35 chr2 37491676 37491735 0 0 chr2 37702947 37703009 0 0

Hi, As I''ve discussed before whenever we add USDT probes to a C++ function and call dtrace -l we get the mangled C++ name for the dtrace function, being listed :( Now the point of USDT probes is to abstract a higher level semantic construct for users to make use of. Surely it is not meant to be listing Unstable Interfaces (implementation details), such as the containing C++

I want to list/use the nfs probes but I get the error "dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches description". Is there a way to enable nfs provider probes? My system is running snv_112 (bfu''ed from the gate archive) # dtrace -lP nfs* ID PROVIDER MODULE FUNCTION NAME dtrace: failed to match nfs*:::: No probe matches

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 05:36:12PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > It's next to impossible for us to do connector probing on topologies > without occasionally racing with userspace, since creating a connector > itself causes a hotplug event which we have to send before probing the > available PBN of a connector. Even if we didn't have this hotplug event > sent, there's still always a chance that us...

Hi all I try to use tinc within my network, but I find almost all mtu probe take 30 times to fix, it's never really fix at all. after read code, i think the problem case by function receive_udppacket(); and line : origin -= MTU / 64 + 20; here , MTU / 64 + 20 =43, this means, every time we send a mtu probe packet, we get a reply smaller then what we send. review the commit log, the line

Apologetic prologue: I've looked through the mailing list for an answer to this (since I'm sure it's trivial) but I have not been able to find a fix. So the problem is that I want each group to have a different type of plot. "Probes" should be points and "Segments" should be lines (preferably using the segment plot command, but I've just been trying --

On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 01:13:36PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 15:11 +0200, Ville Syrj?l? wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 05:36:12PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote: > > > It's next to impossible for us to do connector probing on topologies > > > without occasionally racing with userspace, since creating a connector > > > itself causes a hotplug event which we have to send before probing the > > > available PBN of a connector. Even if we didn't have this hotplug event > > > sent, t...