search for: privlidg

Hi, I have recently upgraded to 3.0.11 and the new user privileges worked fine. Since I applied the user privileges and trust patch, I am now unable to grant privileges to users or groups. The error I am getting is Failed to grant privileges for longhill\Domain Admins (NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE) I have tried all 5 privileges and I get the same error. I suspect it has something to do with

Hello everyone. Im setting up a Samba PDC running 2.2.8a with LDAP on the backend to hold user accounts, machines and passwords. My question is actually on permissions and groups for users who are part of the domain. For example, in my testing, i've been able to successfully join machines and clients to the PDC. However, when I log into the domain with the user, I noticed that they have

Hello list, I am at the hair pulling stage of this game right now. Having read through many of the posts, I still seem to be unable to get my samba server to allow anonymous connections ( or any connections for that matter ) from windows machines. All I want to do is have printers and one folder shared, all as guest accessable. I have made the security level = share and made the shares

Yupp, same results. What else can be trying? Perms all seems a-ok, the name resolution issue makes me feel funny. Here's a URL to the ptrace -f of the non-chrooted run -- http://tinyurl.com/ytsqv .. Although, MIRACULOUSLY, non-chrooted, non-privlidged, port 8000, + DNS works?! Eventhough, without DNS it doesnt. As you can see! -- [2004-05-26 17:10:25] INFO main/main Icecast 2.0.0 server started [2004-05-26 17:10:25] DBUG yp/yp_recheck_config Updating YP configuration [2004-05-26 17:10:25] INFO yp/yp_recheck_config Adding new YP server &quo...

...At 06:26 PM 5/26/2004, you wrote: >Yupp, same results. What else can be trying? Perms all seems a-ok, the name >resolution issue makes me feel funny. Here's a URL to the ptrace -f of the >non-chrooted run -- http://tinyurl.com/ytsqv .. > >Although, MIRACULOUSLY, non-chrooted, non-privlidged, port 8000, + DNS works?! >Eventhough, without DNS it doesnt. As you can see! -- > >[2004-05-26 17:10:25] INFO main/main Icecast 2.0.0 server started >[2004-05-26 17:10:25] DBUG yp/yp_recheck_config Updating YP configuration >[2004-05-26 17:10:25] INFO yp/yp_recheck_config Addin...

...ou wrote: >> Yupp, same results. What else can be trying? Perms all seems a-ok, the name >> resolution issue makes me feel funny. Here's a URL to the ptrace -f of the >> non-chrooted run -- http://tinyurl.com/ytsqv .. >> >> Although, MIRACULOUSLY, non-chrooted, non-privlidged, port 8000, + >> DNS works?! >> Eventhough, without DNS it doesnt. As you can see! -- >> >> [2004-05-26 17:10:25] INFO main/main Icecast 2.0.0 server started >> [2004-05-26 17:10:25] DBUG yp/yp_recheck_config Updating YP configuration >> [2004-05-26 17:10:...

Odd: I just pulled SVN and compiled.. Wonderful new logging code, btw! Now, why in the WORLD would the resolution be failling?! nsswitch.conf / resolv.conf / hosts is all fine.. *shrug* I can obviously put IPs instead of hosts in the URLs, however things still fail.. -- Chris Pickert ldd output-- ldd ./icecast libcurl.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcurl.so.2 (0x4001f000)