Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "privisioning".
Did you mean:
previsioning
2015 Apr 02
4
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 04:43 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote:
>
>> On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
>>
>>> It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in
>>> /etc/os-release
>>>
>> In that particular place it is actually rather important,
2015 Apr 02
3
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
Le 02/04/2015 18:22, Les Mikesell a ?crit :
>> Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time,
>> >regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same
>> >functional package set. This is an important thing.
> Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who only has
> a summary of the RH releases or where the Centos
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
> It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in
> /etc/os-release
In that particular place it is actually rather important, but that is
orthogonal to the ISO name.
2015 Apr 02
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote:
>
> os-release has been at /7/ since the first CentOS 7 release - what extra
> value does having 7.1 in there bring ? At best it just says that your
> centos-release rpm has not been updated and/or there is no system level
> state change that required metadata in that file.
If you know that some
2015 Apr 02
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 11:30 AM, Alain P?an wrote:
> Le 02/04/2015 18:22, Les Mikesell a ?crit :
>>> Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time,
>>> >regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same
>>> >functional package set. This is an important thing.
>> Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who
2012 Oct 29
0
libvirt and thin provisionned LVM
Hi there.
I'm trying to use thin provisionned LVM for som eguests, and I'm having a problem.
Until now, I use LVM pool with success. Here's my pool definition:
<pool type='logical'>
<name>data</name>
<uuid>7f18e030-9d2d-805e-c65f-d12d0681b0a9</uuid>
<capacity unit='bytes'>0</capacity>
<allocation
2013 Jun 21
1
Provision new domain from Windows AD
Hi everyone,
What I want to achieve is to provision a new domain with the users, groups and group policy of an existing AD domain. Is this what I would use the vampire function for? Am I on the wrong track?
Alex Ferrara
Director
Receptive IT Solutions