search for: privisioning

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "privisioning".

Did you mean: previsioning
2015 Apr 02
4
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 04:43 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > >> On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> >>> It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in >>> /etc/os-release >>> >> In that particular place it is actually rather important,
2015 Apr 02
3
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
Le 02/04/2015 18:22, Les Mikesell a ?crit : >> Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time, >> >regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same >> >functional package set. This is an important thing. > Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who only has > a summary of the RH releases or where the Centos
2015 Apr 02
1
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in > /etc/os-release In that particular place it is actually rather important, but that is orthogonal to the ISO name.
2015 Apr 02
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > > os-release has been at /7/ since the first CentOS 7 release - what extra > value does having 7.1 in there bring ? At best it just says that your > centos-release rpm has not been updated and/or there is no system level > state change that required metadata in that file. If you know that some
2015 Apr 02
0
[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS Linux 7 (1503 ) on x86_64
On 04/02/2015 11:30 AM, Alain P?an wrote: > Le 02/04/2015 18:22, Les Mikesell a ?crit : >>> Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time, >>> >regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same >>> >functional package set. This is an important thing. >> Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who
2012 Oct 29
0
libvirt and thin provisionned LVM
Hi there. I'm trying to use thin provisionned LVM for som eguests, and I'm having a problem. Until now, I use LVM pool with success. Here's my pool definition: <pool type='logical'> <name>data</name> <uuid>7f18e030-9d2d-805e-c65f-d12d0681b0a9</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>0</capacity> <allocation
2013 Jun 21
1
Provision new domain from Windows AD
Hi everyone, What I want to achieve is to provision a new domain with the users, groups and group policy of an existing AD domain. Is this what I would use the vampire function for? Am I on the wrong track? Alex Ferrara Director Receptive IT Solutions