search for: privisioned

...extra value does having 7.1 in there bring ? At best it just says that your centos-release rpm has not been updated and/or there is no system level state change that required metadata in that file. Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time, regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same functional package set. This is an important thing. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc

Le 02/04/2015 18:22, Les Mikesell a ?crit : >> Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time, >> >regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same >> >functional package set. This is an important thing. > Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who only has > a summary of the RH releases or where the Centos release stands > compared to it. For example, what would you have said a few...

On 04/02/2015 10:59 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > It's not just the name of the ISO file. c.f. the VERSION_ID variable in > /etc/os-release In that particular place it is actually rather important, but that is orthogonal to the ISO name.

...ussing how fix x is done in package-revs-n1 fix y is in package-rev-n2 and how to check for it. Sometimes you need the latter detail, but mostly not, especially for the application guys. > Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time, > regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same > functional package set. This is an important thing. Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who only has a summary of the RH releases or where the Centos release stands compared to it. For example, what would you have said a few days ago? -- Les...

On 04/02/2015 11:30 AM, Alain P?an wrote: > Le 02/04/2015 18:22, Les Mikesell a ?crit : >>> Note that any CentOS machine, updated to the same point in time, >>> >regardless of where and how it was privisioned should give you the same >>> >functional package set. This is an important thing. >> Yes, but how do you explain that relationship to someone who only has >> a summary of the RH releases or where the Centos release stands >> compared to it. For example, what would you...

Hi there. I'm trying to use thin provisionned LVM for som eguests, and I'm having a problem. Until now, I use LVM pool with success. Here's my pool definition: <pool type='logical'> <name>data</name> <uuid>7f18e030-9d2d-805e-c65f-d12d0681b0a9</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>0</capacity> <allocation

Hi everyone, What I want to achieve is to provision a new domain with the users, groups and group policy of an existing AD domain. Is this what I would use the vampire function for? Am I on the wrong track? Alex Ferrara Director Receptive IT Solutions