search for: privilieges

Dear experts, I am having following problem on samba server side . please help me . 1) our device is running with samba server , in order to allow Microsoft windows mmc to change samba share permissions I am giving SeDiskOperatorPrivilege ( net rpc rights grant admin SeDiskOperatorPrivilege) privilege to samba users. This is working fine as long as our device is in standalone work group

...; # Members of the "domain admins" group may do about anything. > # And rightfully so. > %domain\x20admins ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL > > Apply liberally, where it is warranted. > If there is a need to grant selected domain users elevated rights on the Linux host. In this case root privilieges. This is one way of doing it. Rowland mentioned another. > But to the thoughts train, every user is just one user. > Mapping user to other user is creating a mess you don't want to solve > yourself. > Maybe so. I was merely trying to express a different view. Where Samba is somewh...

Hi, the below patch drops another test for uid 0 on Cygwin. It's embarassing that I never found it. Actually temporarily_use_uid never worked on Cygwin due to that. So far that had no influence, but now that we have activated another feature which makes Cygwin more POSIX-like, somebody on the Cygwin list found that agent forwarding didn't work anymore. The reason is that due to the

...in admins" group may do about anything. >> # And rightfully so. >> %domain\x20admins ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL >> >> Apply liberally, where it is warranted. >> > If there is a need to grant selected domain users elevated rights on > the Linux host. In this case root privilieges. This is one way of > doing it. Rowland mentioned another. > >> But to the thoughts train, every user is just one user. >> Mapping user to other user is creating a mess you don't want to solve >> yourself. >> > Maybe so. I was merely trying to express a differen...

2015-04-17 10:01 GMT+02:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 16/04/15 19:26, David Willis wrote: >> >> Thank you for the reply. >> >> Forgive me if I am not understanding correctly, but.. >> >> I have heard conflicting reports about whether or not to assign UID to >> DOM\administrator, even from threads read on these lists :)