search for: privateshar

On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should work. > Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > Rowland Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses below: The permissions set to /mnt/user/PrivateShare is: drwxrwx---+ 1 ur_admin ur-lab_access 4.0K May 24 2023 PrivateShare/ There is an ACL set on that folder too:...

...wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > > > Rowland > > Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses below: > > The permissions set to /mnt/user/PrivateShare is: > > drwxrwx---+ 1 ur_admin ur-lab_access 4.0K May 24 2023 > Pr...

...the version of Samba from 4.12.14 to 4.17.12) access to shares stops working. Error Summary: [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992, effective(1278739538, 1278738945), real(1278739538, 0)] ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:168(chdir_current_service) chdir_current_service: vfs_ChDir(/mnt/user/PrivateShare) failed: Permission denied. Current token: uid=1278739538, gid=1278738945, 7 groups: 1278739538 1278738945 1278739551 1278739543 1278739547 1278739545 1278739556 Samba is joined to an Active Directory domain as a member server. The following error is found in the log when I attempt to browse to t...

...to 4.17.12) > access to shares stops working. > > Error Summary: > [2024/01/07 21:52:43.357676, 0, pid=93992, effective(1278739538, > 1278738945), real(1278739538, 0)] > ../../source3/smbd/smb2_service.c:168(chdir_current_service) > chdir_current_service: vfs_ChDir(/mnt/user/PrivateShare) failed: > Permission denied. Current token: uid=1278739538, gid=1278738945, 7 > groups: 1278739538 1278738945 1278739551 1278739543 1278739547 > 1278739545 1278739556 > > Samba is joined to an Active Directory domain as a member server. The > following error is found in the log...

...= /etc/samba/smb-shares.conf invalid users = root map acl inherit = Yes map archive = No use sendfile = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr wide links = Yes [flash] comment = Unraid OS boot device force user = root guest ok = Yes map readonly = yes path = /boot read only = No [PrivateShare] path = /mnt/user/PrivateShare read only = No [PrivateShare-A] path = /mnt/user/PrivateShare-A read only = No [PrivateShare-B] path = /mnt/user/PrivateShare-B read only = No [PublicShare] path = /mnt/user/PublicShare read only = No =========================================...

...16 January 2024 at 09:46, Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > As far as I can see, unraid is based on slackware, so it should > > > work. Is it possible to check the ownership & permissions set on > > > /mnt/user/PrivateShare ? > > > > > > Is either apparmor or selinux running ? > > > > > > Rowland > > > > Thanks for the reply, I have included some responses below: > > > > The permissions set to /mnt/user/PrivateShare is: > > > > drwxrwx---+ 1...

On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 17:31:46 +0000 unraidster via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I assumed that the rearranged config you provided was for feedback, Yes, they were just comments, but unraid should really fix their Samba setup. > I > haven't made any changes to the configuration based on those > comments. I'll send a message to the Unraid

I've got a problem I hope someone can help with. We have a directory on a redhat box where we want anyone who creates a file (usually done with samba access) to have that file be created as if by a special "user" and group.. Now in the smb.privateshares config file we specify force user and force group.. However when we create a file in this directory it shows it being owned by the actual person who created it rather than the user specified in the force user = line of the configuration... I've tried to use chmod u+s but that doesn't seem...

Hi I Have a problem: I'm sharing ~600 folders on my samba server: [SHARE 192.168.0.20] comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.20 browseable = yes writable = yes path = /var/archives/USERS/192.168.0.20 public=yes hosts deny = 192.168. EXCEPT 192.168.0.20 [SHARE 192.168.0.21] comment = Private share for host 192.168.0.21 browseable = yes writable = yes path =

...have done it before the net cache flush) ? Started the array (which I believe starts samba). ? At this stage, the shares are not accessible, even by the owner (ur_admin), as you stated the ID values will have changed. ? Ran "chown ur_admin:ur-lab_access" on the /mnt/user and /mnt/user/PrivateShare as root. ? Applied Permissions back onto the /mnt/user/PrivateShare folder using a Windows domain member logged in as TESTLAB\ur_admin via access to the share. ? Update: UR_Admin User - Change Apply To from "This Folder" to "This folder, subfolders and files". ? Add: _RO G...

...net cache flush) > ? Started the array (which I believe starts samba). > ? At this stage, the shares are not accessible, even by the > owner (ur_admin), as you stated the ID values will have changed. > ? Ran "chown ur_admin:ur-lab_access" on the /mnt/user and > /mnt/user/PrivateShare as root. > ? Applied Permissions back onto the /mnt/user/PrivateShare > folder using a Windows domain member logged in as TESTLAB\ur_admin > via access to the share. ? Update: UR_Admin User - Change Apply To > from "This Folder" to "This folder, subfolders and files&quo...