Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2312 matches for "prios".
Did you mean:
prior
2007 May 10
6
PRIO and TBF is much better than HTB??
Hello mailing list,
i stand bevor a mystery and cannot explain it J. I want to do shaping and
prioritization and I have done these following configurations and
simulations. I can´t explain, that the combination of PRIO and TBF is much
better than the HTB (with the prio parameter) alone or in combination with
the SFQ.
Here are my example configurations: 2 Traffic Classes http (80 = 0x50) and
2005 Feb 06
2
problems with u32 fiter
hello to all
i''m trying to set a filter but doesn''t want to work.
i''ve set ut the qdiscs and the classes like this :
tc qdisc add dev ppp0 root handle 1: htb default 20
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 120kbit
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 30kbit ceil 120kbit
tc class add dev ppp0 parent 1:1 classid 1:21 htb rate 30kbit ceil
2007 Aug 29
5
HTB does not respect the prio parameter
Hi all,
I''m experimenting with HTB and the prio parameter and it does not give me results I
expect. I''ve created 4 HTB classes:
1:10 TCP ACKs (prio 0)
1:20 TCP traffic on dst port 10001 (prio 1)
1:30 TCP traffic on dst port 10000 (prio 2)
1:40 Default (prio 3)
ceil and rate parameters are the same for all 4 classes (rate is
2007 Jun 14
16
PQ questions
Hi all,
First, let me say I''ve been most impressed with how quickly and
professionally people on this list ask and answer questions.
Next, let me say that with which I need help is properly configuring strict
PQ, and gathering certain stats. Specifically:
- I need to create a priority queue with four queues (let''s say they are of
high, medium, normal, and low priority)
- I
2004 Aug 18
0
HTB prio question
Hi all. I have a bridge running Linux 2.4.24 that I use as a
bandwidth manager on a broadband wireless network. I''m using HTB and
SFQ to prioritize that share bandwidth on a per-cell basis. My IP
tables rules divide the traffic based on IPand traffic type (using
layer-7 filter and ipp2p). My goal is to make sure that p2p traffic
on the network doesn''t sink all of the
2007 May 02
7
tc u32 match !port
How can i redirect all traffic that not come from port 80 to a flow ?
i was thing about some like
tc filter add dev imq1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 7 u32 match ip sport
!80 ......
But this not work.
Another doubt, if i have two rules that intersects , for example ,
one filter with u32 match ip src 10.10.10.10 flowid 1:10
and other with u32 match sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 , which one will
2004 Apr 06
0
hashing rule don''t match
Hi i have 2 class C 80.97.103.0/24 and 81.180.12.0/24 but i dont konw how
to set hashing tables for HTB
tc add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 handle 1: protocol ip u32 divisor 256 tc
add dev eth0 parent 1: prio 0 protocol ip u32 match src 80.97.103.0/24
hashkey mask 0x000000FF at 12 link 1:
but i want 2 hashkey for 80.97.103.0/24 and for 81.180.12.0/24 can
somebody help me ?
this is a part fo my
2005 Jan 05
0
Best QoS Policy for VoIP
Hello all,
I''ve got a couple redundant (Spanning Tree Protocol) boxes running FC1
minimal install + bridge-utils and they are working great for QoS + ntop
monitoring. I''m wondering if I should handle the VoIP traffic a little
differently. I don''t mind letting VoIP and Video lend out traffic when it
isn''t being used, so that''s why I gave them such
2005 Mar 15
1
Traffic Shaping multiple incoming broadband sources?
Hi, complete newb and I apologise for it.
I have a setup where my linux box has multiple broadband connection where I am routing certain things over certain interfaces, currently 2 links eth2 is a 1500/256 and eth3 is a 512/512, eth0 is the link to the LAN for users. What I am trying to do is traffic shape the information going out eth0 to the local users by the interface the traffic arrived
2004 May 08
2
PRIO qdisc with HTB
Hi,
I''m trying to use prio qdisc with htb, however not the "usual" way (like for
example FairNAT).
Here is my idea:
Root has HTB shaping traffic to link speed -> then goes PRIO queues -> each
prio queue has HTB with sublasses for each user, should look like this:
1: htb qdisc
|
1:1 htb class
2007 Apr 25
0
problem with prio qdisc and tcng
Hello Mailing list,
I have a problem with the prio qdisc and I don´t know what is wrong in my
configuration
This ist a sample configuration and looks like this:
#include "fields.tc"
#include "ports.tc"
#define X16(i) i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
dev ppp0 {
dsmark {
prio(bands 6, priomap X16($be)) {
class if ip_proto == IPPROTO_UDP;
2005 Jul 08
5
HTB Rate and Prio
Hi,
I wanted to implement some QOS on my Linux Box with HTB, but after some time
spend
on the configuration and tests, I still don''t manage to have some correct
results. Here are the details :
-ROOT 2000 kbits
-HIGHPRIO SUBCLASS 50 kbits prio 0
-SUBCLASS1 750 kbits prio 1
-SERVICE1 250 kbits prio 1
2002 Jun 18
7
Better filtering to a class
Dear all,
I want to make a filter for all IRC-Dalnet traffic, so I want to put all
traffic for port 6660, 6661, 6662, 6663, 6664, 6665, 6666, 6667, 6668, 6669,
7000, 7001, 7002, and 8000 to a class. So, I create a TC script as below.
I''m sure, it is not effective, and we can write it in simpler.
I need help, how to make my script below are simpler.
The simpler, the better.
Thank you
2005 Jul 21
2
HTB and prio
Hi,
this is a followup to "Problem with HTB and ceil", the problem with the ceiling
has been resolved, thanks to the memebers on this m/g.
Now I have the problem that packets get into the correct classe with the correct
marks but the prios are not respected. I have 4 different classes:
1. voip class / prio 0 / mark 100 / voip traffic
2. ACK class / prio 1 / mark 200 / ACK packets to keep downloads as fast as
possible
3. SSH class / prio 3 / mark 300 / ssh/scp interactive traffic
4. http/client class / prio 3 / mark 400 / traffic from...
2005 Mar 14
1
htb.init issues
Hi!
Here''s what I want:
root class 0010
premium parent class 1000
premium child classes 1xyz
best-effort parent class 2000
best-effort child classes 2xyz
default class 3000
Here''s how I do it:
eth1:
DEFAULT=3000
eth1-0010.root:
RATE=100Mbit
LEAF=sfq
eth1-0010:1000.premium
CEIL=352Kbit
RATE=352Kbit
PRIO=2
LEAF=sfq
eth1-0010:1000:1xyx.child1
CEIL=32Kbit
RATE=8Kbit
2005 Dec 22
2
strange tc filter behavior
Hi All
I am fighting this for 3 days and could not find any reason it is not working
the way I want to (or I the way think it should).
Internet output interface = eth2 (htb qdisc)
Internet input interface = imq0 (eth2 attached - htb qdisc)
main class = imq0 1:1
sub1 = 1:ffff (default)
sub2 = 1:10 (src ports 1433/tcp or 1434/tcp or 81/tcp or 82/tcp)
sub3 = 1:11 (src and dst port 25/tcp )
2006 Feb 05
1
htb prio ...
Hey, I have such a script:
tc qdisc add dev $DEV root handle 1:0 htb default 21 r2q 2
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:0 classid 1:11 htb rate 100mbit
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:21 htb rate 512kbit ceil
512kbit
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:23 htb rate 1024kbit ceil
1024kbit
tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:11 classid 1:25 htb rate 3072kbit
2004 Jul 09
3
tc filter + bridging + htb -- works only if ip_forward = 0
I thought that the below email would be of interest to LARTC readers. I
wasted quite a bit of time tracking down this "feature" (bug?). Any
comments that shed light on this would be appreciated. In short, "tc
filter" + htb + bridging works only with ip_forward off.
Andrew Athan
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
All:
It seems that
2002 Oct 08
1
how can i choose HTB''s prio
HTB and imq was used to control traffic.
AC="tc class add dev eth0 parent"
$AC 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100kbps burst 2k
$AC 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps
burst 2k prio 1
$AC 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps
burst 2k prio 2
$AC 1:2 classid 1:12 htb rate 50kbps ceil 100kbps
burst 2k
please tell me if i do not set prio, what is the
default prio? low delay class
2007 Feb 18
3
prio not seeming to work
Hello,
I am trying to mess with a prio type qdisc, and must be missing something.
Here''s my sample code:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 1 protocol ip u32 \
match ip dst 208.0.0.0/8 flowid 1:1
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 3 protocol ip u32 \
match ip dst 0.0.0.0/0 flowid 1:3
I would assume that any traffic going to