Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "priortizer".
Did you mean:
priortize
2003 Dec 17
2
Residential router w/ QoS support?
Did anybody ever come across an affordable, residential cable/dsl router
with support for QoS?
The ones I've seen so far (Netgear, D-Link and W-Linx) do not seem to
support it. I noticed that even email can damage a G.711 stream on an
128kbit uplink, leave alone file-sharing applications. I understand this
is strictly related to *, but nevertheless of interest to many of us.
Thilo
2006 Mar 02
1
Managed Switches QoS to deal with network bottleneck
...your opinions and experiences with: 3COM 4500, Linksys SRW224G4? (The 3COM is already pushing the budget limit. I'm sure you get what you pay for with Linksys but - that being said - would it work? Decently well?)
Any thoughts on cheaper approaches such as: D-Link DI-102 (Little Packet Priortizer with 2 RJ45 ports), or lower-end routers with QoS abilities like a WRT54GS? (I'm guessing these are more likely to cause a lot more packet loss than using managed switches)
We are planning on using either Polycom 501, or SNOM 320/360s. Does the switch built into the phone handle QoS for...
2007 Nov 21
2
Is fork { } safe inside of a worker? How else may this be done...
I have a BackgrounDRb worker running every 2 minutes. Here''s the basic idea:
- events = Event.find_all_pending( 2.minutes )
- while( all events have yet to be processed )
---- if( Time.now <= event.time_to_process )
------- fork { process_event }
--- end
--- sleep( 0.25 )
- end
- puts "Done..."
Events that need to be processed within the next 2 minutes are loaded and
2017 Feb 15
2
Re: high memory guest issues - virsh start and QEMU_JOB_WAIT_TIME
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:27:46AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 03:43 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote:
> > On 15 February 2017 at 00:57, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> What is the actual error you're getting during startup.
> >
> > # virsh -d0 start instance-0000037c
> > start: domain(optdata): instance-0000037c
>
2012 Sep 29
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM's Pre-allocation Scheduler Tested against a Branch-and-Bound Scheduler
On Sep 29, 2012, at 2:43 AM, Ghassan Shobaki <ghassan_shobaki at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are currently working on revising a journal article that describes our work on pre-allocation scheduling using LLVM and have some questions about LLVM's pre-allocation scheduler. The answers to these question will help us better document and analyze the results of our benchmark
2012 Sep 29
7
[LLVMdev] LLVM's Pre-allocation Scheduler Tested against a Branch-and-Bound Scheduler
Hi,
We are currently working on revising a journal article that describes
our work on pre-allocation scheduling using LLVM and have some questions about LLVM's pre-allocation scheduler. The answers to these question will help us better document and analyze the results of our benchmark tests that compare our algorithm with LLVM's pre-allocation scheduling algorithm.
First, here is a