search for: prioritizing

Hello, I need to limit the bandwidth to 1Mbit per user IP (and never give more) and inside of each 1Mbit prioritize minimum-delay traffic (video stream from specific servers, so I mangle TOS for packets from those). The problem is I need this for *thousands* of users. I am guessing thousands of classes are needed, but the question is, is this feasible? Could one machine ever handle this? How

i have been googling and reading the docs on how to set up a fair que that gives each user or client ip equal bandwidth. most, if not all, i find are examples how to prioritize by the type of traffic such as ssh, http, ftp, smtp, and various p2p. is it possible to set up cues for each ip on the subnet where each user gets a fair turn. i would probably have to set the max bandwidth and total

Hi routing-experts ! If I want to prioritize up ssh and telnet traffic with Linux 2.4 netfilter and iproute2. I''ve set outbound tcp 22, 23 and 21 TOSbits to minimize delay, but this doesn''t seem to be enough to prioritize ssh over for example http-traffic. I''m using modem to connect to Internet and got an entire LAN behind the Linux router/firewall. Well, I think most

Greetings, I''m new to LARTC and I''m trying to solve a problem with multiple clients accessing a game server. So I thought I''d give traffic control a shot. I''ve downloaded Wonder Shaper and have added this to the default script: tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 12 u32 \ match ip protocol 0x6 0xff flowid 1:3 I''m now quite sure

Hi, I have what to me is an interesting issue. I am wanting to prioritize (QoS) traffic that will be passing through an IPSec (OpenS/WAN) VPN between two (identical) Linux routers. I know that I can apply the IPSec patches (1-4) to the kernel and IPTables (if they are not already applied by now) filter traffic before and after IPSec encapsulation. My problem is that I don''t know

Hello, all. I've stumbled across what seems to be a traffic prioritization issue in a Linux environment and wonder if anyone else has encountered or addressed this issue. We had planned to use expedited forwarding for our RTP and perhaps our SIP packets. Our plan was to set DSCP to 101110 (by the way, I think document http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/snom+360 is in error as I'm almost

Hi, I have several users on the lanside each allocated separate IP addresses. I need to allocate th traffic to each IP addresses certain portion of total uplink. Say, 192.168.0.2 rate 128kbps, ceil 128kbps. 192.168.0.3 rate 65kbps, ceil 128kbps 129.168.0.4 rate 64kbps, ceil 64kbps. and so on.... Also, for each user i would like to prioritize the traffic within the allocated bandwidth. say for

Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. I want to search for something across all of them, but prioritize results to favor one or some of those DBs over others. Is there a way to do that without reindexing? Or

Hello How can I filter (i.e. priorize) RTP protocol and SIP? Has anybody wrote a filter for that in the meantime (In 2006 there was none answer from the list ...) Thanks Beat

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4082 Summary: RFE: prioritize work by size (or other criteria) Product: rsync Version: 2.6.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy:

...to do is pretty straight-forward and common. Unfortunately, the HOWTO doesn''t seem to have a good answer for this simple problem, nor have I been able work out how to do this from wading through a lot of other documentation. It appears that the pfifo_fast qdisc has most of what I want - prioritizing by TOS header. Unfortunately, it is a "work conserving" queue, and won''t work with my cable modem unless I can artificially slow down the link. The tbf qdisc seems like it has the second part of what I want - an artificial upload cap. Unfortunately, it doesn''t do prio...

Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download. However,

...e RTTI system (https://reviews.llvm.org/D39111) that I posted a while back has landed. While this is not ORC specific, I expect it to be used in upcoming patches to allow ORC clients to check the dynamic type of MaterializationUnits. This can be used during dispatch to prioritize work by type, e.g. prioritizing stubs and other trivial-to-materialize symbols. Finally, I hope to spend next week working on support for removable code in OrcV2, which is one of the big missing features from OrcV1. I expect the API to end up looking something like this: using ResourceKey = const class ResourceTracker*; class R...

Hi All, We have been playing around with call queues and asterisk and now have everything set up the way that we want it, bar 1 thing. When we have a scenario of an agent logged into several queues, we want to prioritize the "queue" so that calls in that queue are answered before all the rest. While we can prioritize calls within a queue, this seems to have no affect when an agent

Hello. In short Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO''s chapter 15.4. Prioritizing interactive traffic does not help me at all. I have an asymmetric ADSL connection nominal 64Kbit in / 16Kbit out, real (based on bulk transfers measures) 256Kbit/26Kbit. First thing I would like to improve is to keep interactive (ssh) connection fast even if uplink is full. The test I make for thi...

On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > > I want to search for something across all of them, but > prioritize results

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > >

We're got a T1 from Sprint that we use for internet. During VIOP calls, if you download something, the VOIP calls break up. I found some info at Sprint for adding 'class of service', and I also have some information on configuring our Cisco routers. I've read the relevent pages on the wiki, but it seems vauge what's required and what's required by the NSP (Sprint).

Hi there, i tried to setup up a Linuxbridge for prioritize some interactive (Citrix / https) Traffic to 1.2.3.4 on my ADSL Link, but i think it work not correct. Overview: Router <->Linux Bridge<->internal Net eth1 eth0 This is my Script (with friendly support from the Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic control Howto) #!/bin/sh # # ADSL

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF