search for: prioritise

Exactly what it says in the subject really. Looking for a way to prioritise the netlogon requests on the network above the file share transfers. We have a few desktops that are used for design files and are connected by 1Gbe along with a fleet of WiFi (802.11g generally) enabled laptops. Trying to logon while the desktops are transferring large files can cause some nasty i...

I have a router with about 300 clients connecting to it. It has htb with a class per client. I wnat to create a script to prioritise www trafic and ssh trafic over p2p trafic.... this is a sample of what i have now: /sbin/tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:5 classid 1:8012 htb rate 35Kbit ceil 281Kbit prio 6 /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:8012 handle 8012 sfq perturb 8 /sbin/tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip p...

Hi, Has anyone done anything with the Linux advanced routing stuff to give SIP and IAX traffic priority? What I have in mind is a high-pri queue for voip traffic, all the rest in another queue that gives way to the VOIP stuff. Thanks, Steve

To give fast web browsing on my network, I prioritise http traffic by marking it all into a high priority band (''30''). This generally works quite well, as unidentified traffic such as p2p falls by default into a lower priority band (''40''). However, I would like to de-prioritise anyone doing large downloads over htt...

Hi, I would like to prioritize VOIP traffic when we use the phone, but other times not do traffic shaping at all. Right now I have my openwrt router set up with htb to do shaping. In order to get it to work well I had to set my upload and download speeds much lower than my line speed. With these settings, I get good VOIP reception even while surfing the net and doing a long download. However,

Two easy questions after having read the LARTC HOWTO document (which by the way is a *fantastic* document. Congratulations to all who contributed!) First is: Can I prioritise my "drops" on incoming traffic when the link is overloaded. ie instead of just tail dropping, can I "prefer" to drop certain classes of traffic? If so, do I do this by setting up, say, a HTB tree like on the incoming, but the only action at the leaf is to drop? Second: The...

Hi, Is it possible to put some kind of bridge which will do traffic shaping/prioritising between my 6 external IP addresses and my PPPoA modem interface? My other option is to put some kind of device at the edge of all my networks to shape the traffic in/out. I'd rather do it in one box if possible? thanks Mike

This is a list with some libraries that I have been looking at. The idea is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of adding some of these libraries to Xapian. If anyone knows another library that could be add to the list it would be great! Libfreexl: * For Excel (.xls) * Last release: 2018-02 * Info: gaia-gis.it/fossil/freexl/index * License: MPL tri-license

...one of the changes that we’ve made is to add separate PTRADD, INTTOPTR and PTRTOINT nodes to SelectionDAG, which makes it possible to keep pointer types distinct. We currently have an iFATPTR type, which is not ideal - we’d like to replace this with a set of PTR32 to PTR256 types. I’d be happy to prioritise extracting these patches for upstreaming if that would be useful to others. David

Olly Betts <olly at survex.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 09:33:08PM +0000, Eric Wong wrote: > > Hey all, I've been using ->add_database for a few years > > to tie sharded DBs together and it works great. > > > > Now, I want to be able to search across several DBs > > which aren't sharded, say: linux-DB, glibc-DB, freebsd-DB. > >

Hi I have to manage a network with approx. 200 users, a 256kbit/s unmanaged Internet connection and a 3Mbit/s unreliable managed Internet connection (only http/ftp-proxy and ssh available). All users are in one Class C Subnet with 512 IP-Addresses. 60% of the machines are Windows. The rest are SUN and Linux. At the moment Windows viruses and p2p-traffic eats most of our bandwidth. My Aims are:

...you don't want to find test > failures only when we move your target to official, then it breaks > *all* buildbots, etc. Thanks, I didn't realise nobody was running a public buildbot already that built all experimental archs - though of course that makes sense. In that case I'll prioritise getting something set up. Best, Alex

...in ~/.ssh to their appropriate XDG paths and have OpenSSH continue to find these files without me needing to explicitly configure it to do so with either command options or root access for sshd. I would think this is a perfectly reasonable alternative to ask for, especially if the requirement is to prioritise the legacy ~/.ssh path for backwards compatibility. Would this please at least be taken into consideration? Thank you. 1 February 2024 at 15:27, hi at 90.gripe wrote: > > Hello. I'd like to preface this by saying that while this can be considered a feature request, I am more than happ...

...cated web server and like it a lot but have been using Smoothwall in the office (just because it was already there and we didn''t have any problems with it) and am thinking about changing that to Shorewall as well.. Would there be any feature of Shorewall that would make it possible to prioritise ALL traffic from the Voice gateway IP address to and from the provider IP address and so minimise the breakup when somone else does something? or is this a more complicated thing to do? Thanks..

> My understanding is that clang and llvm themselves are designed this way > (crash when the unexpected happens). I don't think so. I'd view any Clang crash as a bug (probably to be prioritised below silent CodeGen and many others, but not "working as designed"). > For example the fact that clang forks itself to be able to report diagnostics That seems like just trying to make our own job easier to me. I think the entire point of the fork is to get a backtrace we can fix,...

....ssh directory into their respective compliant paths, and have OpenSSH search for those by default, without needing either complex aliases or wrapper scripts with extra usage flags or configuration at the root level. OpenSSH itself would not need to create these directories either, as it may simply prioritise and continue to create the existing ~/.ssh directory. The approach I'm suggesting is one that plenty of long-standing software has taken up in order to provide the opt-in approach of XDGBDS support. Notably, Git provides such a fallback option in $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/git/config in place of the def...

...a(match) by (matchedData$Stage, matchedData$Group, table) matchedData$GP: 0 1 3A 3B 4 1 6 9 10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- myreData$GP: 1 1 3A 3B 4 1 3 9 13 Can anyone point me to a method that tells R to prioritise Stage over the others? Thanks in advance ******************************************************************************************************************** This message may contain confidential information. If yo...{{dropped:19}}

Hi, I'm a newbie. I was looking at the AppDB and I think the voting is a great idea to prioritise what people want and will use. However, I was looking at my favorite game that I want to get fully working on wine - "Company of Heroes (http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=4506)". I can't understand why there isn't a global voting for this like al...

...my OpenSSH T-shirt! My request will add zero bytes to the OpenSSH code base, not even in the contribs directory. Could the subject lines on the mailing list begin with something like [OpenSSH]? I don't know about anyone else, but once you are subscibed to a zillion mailing lists and want to prioritise (OpenSSH at the top, naturally) it would make life easier. I am not too fussed, but I thought this might break the monotony of "Re: authorized_keys2 directory idea" ;-) Keep up the good work. -------------------------------------------------------- Doug Manton, AT&T EMEA Commerci...

Hello Would it be possible for the Subject line of this list to be prefixed with [openssh-unix-dev]: ? I'm on many lists and this is the only one that does'nt. It aids readability and means we all can prioritise all emails in our inbox better. IMO. It should be possible to decide if one wants to read an email from the subject. I believe. Have I just started a flame war? I hope now, I can't be the only one wondering why there is not subject on emails.. can I? JG