Displaying 20 results from an estimated 9879 matches for "priore".
Did you mean:
prior
2011 Mar 13
1
How to draw different series for different groups in xyplot
Hi guys,
I got a problem when I was trying to use lattice to do some plot. Below is
one working example which can generate one curve for A and one curve for B
in each subplot. However, I would like to just show the points for B, not
connecting the dots. As for A, I still want a curve (dots are connected). Is
there any people having any suggestions. Data are attached. Thanks a lot,
--Jerry
2006 Mar 11
2
weird! QDA does not depend on priors?
Hi all,
If I run LDA on the same data (2-class classification) with default(no
priors specified in the lda function) vs. "prior=c(0.5, 0.5)", the results
are different.
The (0.5, 0.5) priors give better 1-classify-to-1 rate, and the proportional
priors(default, no priors specified in the lda function) give better
0-classify-to-0 rate, for both training and testing data sets.
However,
2007 May 28
0
[ wxruby-Bugs-11183 ] GLib errors cause crash
Bugs item #11183, was opened at 2007-05-28 10:28
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=11183&group_id=35
Category: Incorrect behavior
Group: current
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Patrick McDonnell (kc9ddi)
Assigned to: Kevin Smith (qualitycode)
Summary: GLib errors cause crash
Initial Comment:
Hi - I''m
2005 Jun 15
3
Error using newdata argument in survfit
Dear R-helpers,
To get curves for a pseudo cohort other than the one centered at the mean of
the covariates, I have been trying to use the newdata argument to survfit
with no success. Here is my model statement, the newdata and the ensuing
error. What am I doing wrong?
> summary(fit)
Call:
coxph(formula = Surv(Start, Stop, Event, type = "counting") ~
Week + LagAOO + Prior.f +
2010 May 16
1
predict.lda breaks when priors are specified
Dear R help,
What am I doing wrong here? when I don't specify the priors it works
just fine but when I specify the priors it breaks.? Does anyone know
why and how I can fix it?
----
> N=20000
> ncontrol=ncases=50
> X <- as.matrix(rnorm(N,0,1))
> eta <- -5.3 + X * 1.7
> p <- exp(eta)/(1+exp(eta))
> Y <- rbinom(N,1,p)
> controls <- sample(seq_len(N),
2012 May 02
0
MCMCglmm priors including phylogeny
Hi all,
I'm hoping I might be able to get some help with some issues specifying priors for MCMCglmm.
I'm trying to fit a gaussian glmm using MCMCglmm to a data set with two (correlated) response variables. The response variables are both logit-transformed proportions (there are a few reasons why I've chosen these with gaussian error over binomal glmm, which I won't go into).
2011 Jul 14
1
Amelia_Multiple_Imputation_with_observational_priors_noms
I am fairly new at using R/programming in general so I apologize if I am
leaving crucial parts of the puzzle out, but here goes.
First and foremost this is the error I am receiving:
Error in muPriors[priors[, 1:2]] <- priors[, 3] :
NAs are not allowed in subscripted assignments
This occurs only when I am using observational priors and some number of
nominal variables, it does not
2007 Jan 03
12
instalation problem
Hi
Im testing wxRuby. I have a problem when ruby try to load the load wx.
Im newbie to ruby, maybe a make a simple mistake :
Best regards.
Install wxRuby--------------------------------------------------------------
pedro@la-vaca-azul:~$ sudo gem install wxruby2-preview
Need to update 2 gems from http://gems.rubyforge.org
..
complete
Select which gem to install for your platform (i486-linux)
2006 Nov 12
0
[ wxruby-Bugs-6633 ] Serious (but harmless?) GTK warnings on Linux
Bugs item #6633, was opened at 2006-11-12 16:46
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=6633&group_id=35
Category: Incorrect behavior
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 2
Submitted By: Alex Fenton (brokentoy)
Assigned to: Kevin Smith (qualitycode)
Summary: Serious (but harmless?) GTK warnings on Linux
Initial Comment:
2007 May 03
1
Bayesian logistic regression with a beta prior (MCMClogit)
Dear all,
I am trying to use the logistic regression with MCMClogit (package:
MCMCpack/Coda) and I want to put a beta prior on the parameters, but it's
giving me error message (please see output below) no matter what shape 1 or
2 I use. It works perfect with the cauchy or normal priors. Do you know if
there is a catch there somewhere? Thanks
logpriorfun <- function(beta,shape1,shape2){
2003 Sep 02
5
Strange problem.
Hi, everyone,
I am a new user of R. Recently, I tried the following commands, but couldn't make them work. If any one of you has some ideas about it, please help me. The commands are
>std<-1000
>mean<-8000
>prior<-function(n){1/(sqrt(2*pi)*std)*exp(-1.0*(n-mean)^2/(2*std^2))}
>plot(prior,1,15000)
>post<-function(n){
+ if(n < 9543)
+ 0
+ else
+ prior(n)/n
+
2007 Jul 08
1
rpart weight prior
Hi!
Could you please explain the difference between "prior" and "weight" in
rpart? It seems to be the same. But in this case why including a weight
option in the latest versions? For an unbalanced sampling what is the
best to use : weight, prior or the both together?
Thanks a lot.
Aur?lie Davranche.
2018 May 01
2
Specifying priors in a multi-response MCMCglmm
Hi all,
I previously emailed about a multinomial model, and after seeking some
additional help, realized that since my response/outcome variables are not
mutually exclusive, I need to use a multi-response model that is *not*
multinomial. I'm now trying to figure out how to specify the priors on the
multi-response model. Any help would be much appreciated.
My data look like this:
X
2008 Sep 17
3
Is there a way to not use an explicit loop?
I have a problem in where i generate m independent draws from a
binomial distribution,
say
draw1 = rbinom( m , size.a, prob.a )
then I need to use each draw to generate a beta distribution. So,
like using a beta prior, binomial likelihood, and obtain beta
posterior, m many times. I have not found out a way to vectorize
draws from a beta distribution, so I have an explicit for loop
2012 Feb 21
1
prior.weights and weights()
I'm wondering whether anyone has any insight into why the 'simulate'
methods for the built-in glm() families (binomial, Poisson, Gamma ...)
extract the prior weights using object$prior.weights rather than
weights(object,"prior") ?
At first I thought this was so that things work correctly when e.g.
subset= and na.action=na.exclude are used. However, the current versions
of
2018 May 01
0
Specifying priors in a multi-response MCMCglmm
1. (Mainly) Statistical issues are generally off topic on this list.
You might want to try the r-sig-mixed-models list instead.
2. However, I think a better answer is to seek local statistical
expertise in order to have an extended discussion about your research
intent in order to avoid producing yet more irreproducible
psychological research.
Cheers,
Bert
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with
2010 Feb 17
2
Problems with xyplot
Hello
I wonder whether someone can tell me what I am doing wrong. Here is the
code (from Bayesian Computation with R - Chapter 2.3.R) that I am trying to
run
####################################
# Section 2.3 Using a Discrete Prior
####################################
graphics.off() # Close all graphics
rm(list=ls()) # Clear all variables
library(LearnBayes)
2006 Mar 05
3
Where to declare S4 classes?
Dear listers,
I am making a trial to move from S3 to S4... I have created some classes
of interest and they work acceptably well for the purpose. I am now
wondering how to make them operate in a package. In clear when a package
is loaded (eg library(mypackage)) where should I put the class descriptions:
2017 Jul 23
1
BayesianTools update prior
Hi,
Using the example in ?VSEM in the package BayesianTools I'm attempting to iteratively update the prior but find the plotTimeSeriesResults produces the following errors when I extend the VSEM example in BayesianTools. With the Code below (the errors) I get:
" Error in quantile.default(x, probs = quantiles[i]) :
missing values and NaN's not allowed if 'na.rm' is
2024 Oct 29
0
X.Org Security Advisory: Issues in X.Org X server prior to 21.1.14 and Xwayland prior to 24.1.4
X.Org Security Advisory: October 29, 2024
Issues in X.Org X server prior to 21.1.14 and Xwayland prior to 24.1.4
========================================================================
An issue has been found in the X server and Xwayland implementations
published by X.Org for which we are releasing security fixes for in
xorg-server-21.1.14 and xwayland-24.1.4.
1) CVE-2024-9632 can be triggered