Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "printoptionvalues".
2012 Feb 20
1
[LLVMdev] ARM opcode format
...PM, FOS, FileType, OLvl, NoVerify)) {
// errs() << argv[0] << ": target does not support generation of this"
// << " file type!\n";
// return 1;
// }
// Before executing passes, print the final values of the LLVM options.
// cl::PrintOptionValues();
// PM.run(mod);
//}
// Declare success.
//Out->keep();
// mods for cryo
// create an execution engine to export code later
EngineBuilder eBuilder(&mod);
std::string error;
eBuilder.setErrorStr(&error);
ExecutionEngine *TheExecutionEngine = eBuilder.cr...
2013 Jan 07
0
[LLVMdev] How to output a .S *and* a .OBJ file?
...ype!\n");
return false;
}
if (Target.addPassesToEmitFile(PM, FOS_OBJ, FileType_OBJ, NoVerify)) {
printf( "target does not support generation of this file type!\n");
return false;
}
// Before executing passes, print the final values of the LLVM options.
cl::PrintOptionValues();
PM.run(*module);
}
// Declare success.
Out_S->keep();
Out_OBJ->keep();
2012 Feb 20
0
[LLVMdev] ARM opcode format
Guillermo,
> I'm sorry I forgot to mention I am compiling the bitcode using the JIT. The
> actual error, I get when I'm trying to get the function to the pointer. I'm
> using a custom front end that translates Android's Dalvik bytecode into LLVM
> bitcode based on Android ICS's modified LLVM version.
ARM JIT is broken in many ways. So, what you're seeing is
2012 Feb 20
3
[LLVMdev] ARM opcode format
Hi,
I'm sorry I forgot to mention I am compiling the bitcode using the JIT. The
actual error, I get when I'm trying to get the function to the pointer. I'm
using a custom front end that translates Android's Dalvik bytecode into
LLVM bitcode based on Android ICS's modified LLVM version.
Thanks,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:55 PM, James Molloy <James.Molloy at arm.com>
2017 Aug 22
5
[RFC] mir-canon: A new tool for canonicalizing MIR for cleaner diffing.
Patch for review.
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM Puyan Lotfi <puyan.lotfi.llvm at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Ping.
>
> Still working on preparing code for review. Will have a patch for review
> ready in the coming days.
>
> PL
>
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:06 PM Puyan Lotfi <puyan.lotfi.llvm at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>