search for: printops

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "printops".

Did you mean: printop
2005 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify printOp > for your asmprinters. I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? Aaron
2018 Jun 13
3
NSS and group enumeration in CUPS...
I was used (in SambaNT/OpenLDAP) to put on CUPS configuration the statement (/etc/cups/cups-files.conf): SystemGroup printops and add to 'printops' group some users that can manage cups. Now i'm in AD mode. I'm in 'printops' group: root at vdmpp1:~# id gaio uid=10000(gaio) gid=10513(domain users) gruppi=10513(domain users),11001(sir),10999(unixadm),10998(printops),5001(BUILTIN\users),5000(BUI...
2005 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
>>> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify >>> printOp for your asmprinters. >> >> I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? > > Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. The GAS intel code generator generates percents, look at the X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of
2018 Jun 13
0
NSS and group enumeration in CUPS...
...via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 juni 2018 9:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] NSS and group enumeration in CUPS... > > > I was used (in SambaNT/OpenLDAP) to put on CUPS configuration the > statement (/etc/cups/cups-files.conf): > > SystemGroup printops > > and add to 'printops' group some users that can manage cups. > > > Now i'm in AD mode. I'm in 'printops' group: > > root at vdmpp1:~# id gaio > uid=10000(gaio) gid=10513(domain users) > gruppi=10513(domain > users),11001(sir),10999(u...
2005 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify printOp >> for your asmprinters. > > I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
2005 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>>> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify >>>> printOp for your asmprinters. >>> I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? >> Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. > > The GAS intel code generator generates percents,
2023 Nov 05
0
cups systemd dependencies on winbind?
I'm using an AD group in cupsd configuration: SystemGroup printops in cups-files.conf, where 'printops' is an AD group. I hoped that systemd 'self healing' would suffices, but not: cups start before wibind, does not found 'printops' group and fail. There's some better way to force a deps; I'm thinking of an: systemctl edit cu...
2005 Jul 11
2
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 19:24 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> The NASM like the MASM does not have % symbols on the register names so >> will >> either inherit from the MASM printer or have its own TableGen class. > > Couldn't one conditionally output some macros for the assembler to > translate the reg names rather than having another .td file? or is '%'
2005 Jul 11
0
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 19:24 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> The NASM like the MASM does not have % symbols on the register names so >>> will >>> either inherit from the MASM printer or have its own TableGen class. >> >> Couldn't one conditionally output some macros for the assembler to >> translate the
2005 Jul 12
2
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
>> The GAS intel code generator generates percents, look at the >> X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of them. > > Ah, I see what you're talking about. Please feel free to remove all of > those from the Intel format. For example, change this: > > def IN8rr : I<0xEC, RawFrm, (ops), > "in{b} {%dx, %al|%AL, %DX}">, Imp<[DX],
2003 Dec 19
2
SMB 3.0.1/LDAP Cannot add computer to domain
I'm trying to setup samba with ldapsam (Novell eDir 8.7.1). Right now I can login to samba and browse my shares with user "Administrator", but when I'm trying to add computer to domain I get "unknown user name or bad password" error. I have administrator, root and nobody accounts in ldap. And I have manualy added following groupmappings to ldap-groups: Domain Users
2007 Sep 11
0
some users cannot authenticate against ADS
...dos filetimes = Yes dos filetime resolution = No fake directory create times = No vfs objects = msdfs root = No msdfs proxy = [Software] path = /opt/software/ guest ok = Yes [print$] path = /etc/samba/printer/ valid users = @printops write list = @printops force group = "printops" force create mode = 0664 force directory mode = 0775 [... stripped other shares ... ]
2017 Aug 24
2
"net view" gets me "System error 71 has occured" and "no more connections ...."
Hai, Sorry if you feel like that but i always have to ask this. Your aswer is not help also for me, because without smb.conf OS and samba version we know nothing.. We dont like guessing, because everybody's time is precious. So please tell more about your system, i suggest start with. OS Samba version Smb.conf Upgraded from samba 3.??? To samba 4.?? The more you tell us te better we
2005 Jul 13
0
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of them. >> >> Ah, I see what you're talking about. Please feel free to remove all of >> those from the Intel format. For example, change this: >> >> def IN8rr : I<0xEC, RawFrm, (ops), >> "in{b} {%dx, %al|%AL, %DX}">, Imp<[DX],
2016 May 09
2
Replacing an instruction in a post-RA pass
I'm writing a pass that looks at the operands of certain non-commutable instructions and swaps a couple of them if certain conditions exist (a register bank conflict in the instruction). If the conflict exists, I build a new instruction which has the 2nd and 3rd operands swapped (using BuildMI). Then I want to get rid of the original instruction. I had done some searching and found that
2005 Jul 11
3
[LLVMdev] X86AsmPrinter + MASM and NASM backends
>> I am not really sure whether to do a X86NASMPrinter or whether to bypass >> that for now and work on an X86COFFWriter which would be more useful to >> me ? > > I wouldn't suggest writing an X86NASMPrinter: just change the current > Intel printer to do what you want. Noone is currently using the intel > printer, so you can do what you wish to it. Once I
2003 Jan 07
1
Problem I am having with Samba 2.2.7a and Win2k
Hi ... I am desperate now to solve this problem ... this is my absolute last resort attempt! I have read of the problem on a number of posts/newsgroups/webpages - but there a very little solutions - or causes - none of the solutions have worked for me! Basically my samba is happily running and I can connect to it fine from 9x clients and from 2k client as a workgroup. However..... If I try to
2004 Jul 21
2
strange DOS-Error 58
Hi, based on Bart Lagerweij's ( www.nu2.nu ) bootdisk, I've created a small DOS system that users can start by booting from network ( PXE ). The system is configured to map a network drive from a Suse 9.0 Pro / Samba server with various tools on it. The connection is anonymous. Until recently everything worked fine but suddenly there are strange errors: When I try to launch an EXE from