search for: printoper

> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify printOp > for your asmprinters. I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? Aaron

I was used (in SambaNT/OpenLDAP) to put on CUPS configuration the statement (/etc/cups/cups-files.conf): SystemGroup printops and add to 'printops' group some users that can manage cups. Now i'm in AD mode. I'm in 'printops' group: root at vdmpp1:~# id gaio uid=10000(gaio) gid=10513(domain users) gruppi=10513(domain

>>> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify >>> printOp for your asmprinters. >> >> I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? > > Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. The GAS intel code generator generates percents, look at the X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of

...nd groups with GIDS also. Like this. uid=10002(someuser) gid=10000(domain users) groups=10000(domain users),4(adm),27(sudo),116(lpadmin),1951(sshgroup),10005(remote-webmail),10004(servers-ssh),10008(servers-www),2001(BUILTIN\users) Running : kinit Administrator net rpc rights list privileges SePrintOperatorPrivilege -S $(hostname -f) -k Shows me : SePrintOperatorPrivilege: BUILTIN\Print Operators NTDOM\Domain Admins BUILTIN\Administrators Still possible that i missed a setting, try above out, you know where to reach us. ;-) Thats about it. I use cups with point and print setup. So th...

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify printOp >> for your asmprinters. > > I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>>> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify >>>> printOp for your asmprinters. >>> I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? >> Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. > > The GAS intel code generator generates percents,

I'm using an AD group in cupsd configuration: SystemGroup printops in cups-files.conf, where 'printops' is an AD group. I hoped that systemd 'self healing' would suffices, but not: cups start before wibind, does not found 'printops' group and fail. There's some better way to force a deps; I'm thinking of an: systemctl edit cups.service adding: [Unit]

> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 19:24 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >> The NASM like the MASM does not have % symbols on the register names so >> will >> either inherit from the MASM printer or have its own TableGen class. > > Couldn't one conditionally output some macros for the assembler to > translate the reg names rather than having another .td file? or is '%'

On Mon, 11 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 19:24 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> The NASM like the MASM does not have % symbols on the register names so >>> will >>> either inherit from the MASM printer or have its own TableGen class. >> >> Couldn't one conditionally output some macros for the assembler to >> translate the

>> The GAS intel code generator generates percents, look at the >> X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of them. > > Ah, I see what you're talking about. Please feel free to remove all of > those from the Intel format. For example, change this: > > def IN8rr : I<0xEC, RawFrm, (ops), > "in{b} {%dx, %al|%AL, %DX}">, Imp<[DX],

I'm trying to setup samba with ldapsam (Novell eDir 8.7.1). Right now I can login to samba and browse my shares with user "Administrator", but when I'm trying to add computer to domain I get "unknown user name or bad password" error. I have administrator, root and nobody accounts in ldap. And I have manualy added following groupmappings to ldap-groups: Domain Users

Hi everyone, this one is giving me headaches for a while now and I could not get anything useful from the usual sources. So maybe someone on this list can give me any ideas: There is a samba server Version 3.0.22 on Ubuntu Dapper see below for configuration details) and it is configured to authenticate against a Windows 2000 Server Ver. 5.0.2.195 preped for ADS 2003 and

Hai, Sorry if you feel like that but i always have to ask this. Your aswer is not help also for me, because without smb.conf OS and samba version we know nothing.. We dont like guessing, because everybody's time is precious. So please tell more about your system, i suggest start with. OS Samba version Smb.conf Upgraded from samba 3.??? To samba 4.?? The more you tell us te better we

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005, Aaron Gray wrote: >>> X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of them. >> >> Ah, I see what you're talking about. Please feel free to remove all of >> those from the Intel format. For example, change this: >> >> def IN8rr : I<0xEC, RawFrm, (ops), >> "in{b} {%dx, %al|%AL, %DX}">, Imp<[DX],

I'm writing a pass that looks at the operands of certain non-commutable instructions and swaps a couple of them if certain conditions exist (a register bank conflict in the instruction). If the conflict exists, I build a new instruction which has the 2nd and 3rd operands swapped (using BuildMI). Then I want to get rid of the original instruction. I had done some searching and found that

>> I am not really sure whether to do a X86NASMPrinter or whether to bypass >> that for now and work on an X86COFFWriter which would be more useful to >> me ? > > I wouldn't suggest writing an X86NASMPrinter: just change the current > Intel printer to do what you want. Noone is currently using the intel > printer, so you can do what you wish to it. Once I

Hi ... I am desperate now to solve this problem ... this is my absolute last resort attempt! I have read of the problem on a number of posts/newsgroups/webpages - but there a very little solutions - or causes - none of the solutions have worked for me! Basically my samba is happily running and I can connect to it fine from 9x clients and from 2k client as a workgroup. However..... If I try to

Hi, based on Bart Lagerweij's ( www.nu2.nu ) bootdisk, I've created a small DOS system that users can start by booting from network ( PXE ). The system is configured to map a network drive from a Suse 9.0 Pro / Samba server with various tools on it. The connection is anonymous. Until recently everything worked fine but suddenly there are strange errors: When I try to launch an EXE from