search for: printfchar

Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "printfchar".

2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...C/PR10189 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ManyArguments SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-0...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ce/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-08-19-CodegenBug | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-07-17-INT-To-FP | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2005-05-12-Int64ToFP | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2006-12-07-Compare64BitConstant | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/block-copied-in-cxxobj-1...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0076 1256 0.0056 * 0.0054 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0027 540 0.0020 * 0.0020 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0024 596 0.0022 * 0.0021...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0120 1240 0.0120 * 0.0080 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0040 524 0.0000 * 0.0040 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0040 580 0.0040 * 0.0040...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0078 1232 0.0052 * 0.0050 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0058 532 0.0073 * 0.0015 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0033 588 0.0018 * 0.0018...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...* 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0032 1288 0.0029 * 0.0028 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0011 564 0.0010 * 0.0010 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest | 0.0011 612 0.0013 * 0.0011...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...02 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace                                      | > 0.0100 1128     0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar                             | > 0.0100 576      0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.00 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest                           | > 0.0000 624      0.0000      *            ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > testtrace | 0.0100 1128 > 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17- > PrintfChar | 0.0100 576 0.0000 > * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.00 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02- > ArgumentTest | 0.0000 624 0.0000 &gt...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...2084 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140130/eed1a30d/attachment.sh> -------------- next part -------------- IRFile NumFunctionsTotal InitialSize MergedNoPatch TimeNoPatch SizeNoPatch MergedWithPatch TimeWithPatch SizeWithPatch 2002-04-17-PrintfChar.ll 2 2172 0 0.00 2163 0 0.00 2163 2002-05-02-ArgumentTest.ll 2 3164 0 0.01 3155 0 0.01 3155 2002-05-02-CastTest1.ll 1 2121 0 0.01 2112 0 0.01 2112 2002-05-02-CastTest2.ll 2 3803 0 0.01 3794 0 0.01 3794 2002-05-02-CastTest3.ll 1 2938 0 0.01 2929 0 0.01 2929 2002-05-02-CastTest.ll 2 11291 0 0.01 1128...