search for: print_value

...6fc: 440335ab 0000000c 00010076 0031e748 0x0031e70c: 4403366b 20736e69 00010076 0000000c 0x0031e71c: 00000000 0031eb28 7369642f 3273306b 0x0031e72c: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 0200: sel=1007 base=7ffc0000 limit=00000fff 32-bit rw- Backtrace: =>0 0x20736e69 (0x0031e708) fixme:winedbg:print_value ---error fixme:winedbg:print_value ---error 1 0x4403366b call_window_proc+0xcc(hwnd=, msg=0x10076, wp=0xc, lp=0, result=, arg=0x7369642f) in user32 (0x0031e748) fixme:winedbg:print_value ---error fixme:winedbg:print_value ---error 2 0x44036464 CallWindowProcW+0x80(func=, hwnd=, msg=0x10076, wPa...

...= 1 632: iload local_5_420 = 261095424 local_4_419 = 1 -------------- next part -------------- 2646: li 3, 632 2647: mr 4, 13 2648: bl trace_bytecode 2649: lis 13, dump57 at ha 2650: la 3, dump56 at l(14) 2651: mr 4, 26 2652: bl print_value 2653: la 3, dump57 at l(13) 2654: mr 4, 27 2655: bl print_value 2656: ori 4, 21, 7712 2657: li 3, 634 2658: bl trace_bytecode 2659: lis 3, 4031 2660: lwz 3, -12952(3) 2661: cmplwi 0, 3, 1 2662: beq 0...

On 2008-06-11, at 13:16, Gary Benson wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >> Can you please attach IR which can be compiled to an executable >> (and shows the problem). > > I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling > them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way > I can get compilable IR from that?

Duncan Sands wrote: > Can you please attach IR which can be compiled > to an executable (and shows the problem). I've been generating functions using a builder and then compiling them with ExecutionEngine::getPointerToFunction(). Is there some way I can get compilable IR from that? Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/

...an see. I attached a copy of the IR, both for the entire function and for that section with only the blocks that are actually entered as the function executes. grepping it for local_5 I don't see anything that would modify it. There is some tracing code too, the calls to @trace_bytecode and @print_value; the output from that is also attached. The bizarre thing is that if I add print the value of local_5 at every bytecode then everything is correct. This is what is making me suspect a miscompilation. Thanks in advance for any help! Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/

...ift # Shifting removes the row containing the <th> table header elements. @rows.delete([]) # Remove any empty rows in our array of arrays. @numrows = @rows.length end def clean_celldata @rows[@numrows-1][0] = 120 end # Print a joined list by row to see our results def print_values puts "Number of rows = #{numrows}." for i in 0..@numrows-1 puts @rows[i].join('', '') end end end # In our search we are supplying the website url to parse, the type of element (ex: table), the class name of that element # and the child element that co...

...rushing = Scraper.new(''http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/natlRank.jsp?year=2008&rpt=IA_teamrush&site=org'', ''table'', ''statstable'', ''//tr'') offensive_rushing.scrape_data offensive_rushing.clean_celldata offensive_rushing.print_values offensive_rushing.update_rushing_offense # the call to the method above end Now if I run the rake file what is going to happen is I''m going to get an error stating: Table ''project_development.scrapers'' doesn''t exist: I believe I understand why that''...