search for: pringlemeir

[klibc] [PATCH] fix ARM longjmp with zero 'val'. We need to set the condition codes on the ARM. The previous version was using a left over condition code from the caller. Also, use conditional execution to eliminate branch and reduce size. Signed-off-by: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle at sympatico.ca> diff --git a/usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S b/usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S index 92ffc43..9f96274 100644 --- a/usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S +++ b/usr/klibc/arch/arm/setjmp.S @@ -40,10 +40,9 @@ setjmp: .type longjmp, #function longjmp: ldmia r0, {r4, r...

Commit-ID: f05ff116bb9edbbb81d82fa47b78e630ce878470 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=f05ff116bb9edbbb81d82fa47b78e630ce878470 Author: Bill Pringlemeir <bpringle at sympatico.ca> AuthorDate: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 13:29:52 -0400 Committer: maximilian attems <max at stro.at> CommitDate: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 18:41:43 +0200 [klibc] [PATCH] fix ARM longjmp with zero 'val'. We need to set the condition codes on the ARM. The previous version...

This release continues to stabilise the stdio codebase. It has fixes for latest linux 3.6, a sync to latest dash and of course several arm fixes. Thank you all. Bill Pringlemeir (1): [klibc] [PATCH] fix ARM longjmp with zero 'val'. Christoph Mathys (1): [klibc] [BUILTIN] Add support for ulimit -r Colin Watson (1): [klibc] include: [sys/time.h] fix for Linux 3.5.1 David S. Miller (1): [klibc] [SHELL] Allow building without LINEO support H...

Why does the source use `int64_t'. Is this suppose to be built with GCC? I have Mumit Kahns gcc, version 2.8.1. Do I need a 2.9.5 version to get the `int64_t' type? I have substituted a typedef of `long long' in os_types.h. This seems to make sense? The rint() macro also seems to be having some problems. I guess there are two meanings to __GNUC__ and _WIN32. One is the OS and