Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "preventcorefil".
Did you mean:
preventcorefiles
2013 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] Problems with parallelizing lli
...ializeNativeTarget();
- InitializeNativeTargetAsmPrinter();
-
- cl::ParseCommandLineOptions(argc, argv,
- "llvm interpreter & dynamic compiler\n");
-
- // If the user doesn't want core files, disable them.
- if (DisableCoreFiles)
- sys::Process::PreventCoreFiles();
-
+typedef struct {
+ int argc;
+ char **argv;
+ char *const *envp;
+} arg_t;
+
+void *run(void *arg) {
+ int argc = ((arg_t *) arg)->argc;
+ char **argv = ((arg_t *) arg)->argv;
+ char *const *envp = ((arg_t *) arg)->envp;
+ LLVMContext Context;
// Load the bitcode......
2007 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH (rest of code changes) "bytecode" --> "bitcode"
Here is the bulk of the sanitizing.
My residual doubts center around the question
whether we still do/want to support (un)compressed *byte*code
in 2.0/2.1.
I need a definitive word on this to proceed.
My understanding is that bytecode is already gone, but there are
still some functions/enums that really deal with *byte*code
(instead of *bit*code).
I did not touch those areas, so the attached