search for: presumptive

> On 17 July 2018 at 09:24, Jay Hart <jhart at kevla.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. >> 16GB??? >> > > > Jay, it helps us help you when you give more information. > > I have CentOS 7 running happily on 4GB. My presumption - based on > experience, extrapolation, and google

>>> > I think these changes would solve the thing. > > ... > -EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp; > +EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp =NULL; > ... > > -? ? if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) > +? ? if (status != EFI_SUCCESS || sbp == NULL) >? ? ? ? goto free_binding; > ... The presumption was that we'd see an error rather than non-error from LibLocateHandle()

Does anyone understand the purpose of : TargetRegisterInfo::getMinimalPhysRegClass ??? Why is there the presumption to use the minimal subclass? For Mips, it would work for me if we changed this to a virtual function and then I could override this to have it chose the proper register class based on the processor. I want to introduct a different register class for MIPS 16 but don't want

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 27, 2015 12:30 PM, "Patrick Masotta" <masottaus at yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >> > I think these changes would solve the thing. >> > >> > ... >> > -EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp; >> > +EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp =NULL;

I am currently (still) running Fedora 17 --- having not managed to screw my courage to the sticking place and upgrade. Even though we are now up to Fedora 20, I think. The traffic on the Fedora mailing list on the upgrading issue is a bit terrifying. I would just like to confirm that: It is ***NOT*** possible to download a binary of R for Fedora 17. Is this correct? My efforts to

Hello CentOS Community Members, What is RH's be-all end-all justification for staying with an ancient code base for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? That question is

...that no other end point will answer the request. I suppose manually executing Hangup() justifies the first statement but it's the last sentence that bothers me: "returned only if the client (Asterisk) knows that no other end point will answer the request" That's a little presumptive of the Asterisk system, don't you think? ;) While I don't have any better alternative responses I'm just bothered by the "global" nature of 6xx failures in the first place. Any thoughts? -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.star...

On May 14, 2012, at 1:02 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Does anyone understand the purpose of : > > TargetRegisterInfo::getMinimalPhysRegClass ??? Barely. > Why is there the presumption to use the minimal subclass? The function can be traced back to a time when men were men and registers belonged to ONE register class. That concept doesn't make sense any longer, as LLVM supports and

On 17 Mar 2015, at 13:11, Tyro Software <softwaretyro at gmail.com> wrote: > > As an alternative to fixing the "char == 8 bits" presumption would using non-uniform pointer types have been another possible approach, e.g. keep char as 8 bit but have char* encode both the word address and the byte location within it (i.e. one extra bit in this 16-bit case). Of course this is

R 1.4.0 ?stars has scale: logical flag: if `TRUE', the columns of the data matrix are scaled independently so that the maximum value in each column is 1 and the minimum is 0. If `FALSE', the presumption is that the data have been scaled by some other algorithm to the range [0,1]. but the code has if (scale) { x <- sweep(x, 2,

How to force R to print 2 decimal places in column of a data.frame? I tried to do so: x = inp(format(rounf(inp$Tamanho, 2), nsmall = 2),) where "INP" is data.frame and "Size" is the name of column. But has error: Error in eval.with.vis(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "inp" Lesandro Veja quais s?o os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados

After setting up Samba 3 I noticed the Windows 2000 box was requesting a ticket from the KDC for HOST/<NETBIOS NAME>@MYREALM.COM when it tried to connect to the Samba server. I presume that W2K is sending the ticket it is granted along to the Samba server. If that presumption is correct, is it possible to make Samba authenticate the user with the Kerberos ticket they present? If so, how

Hello, What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. 16GB??? Thanks, Jay

>>> Jeff, Patrick: Could you try my code from my github repo branch efi-multinic?? It's derived from Patrick's code and I finally see good responses with a VMware VM's e1000e NIC (never saw ANYTHING good from it until now). git://github.com/geneC/syslinux.git https://github.com/geneC/syslinux.git -- -Gene <<< Hi there I think in the case of a particular

At 2013-12-15 22:43:34,"Caldarale, Charles R" <Chuck.Caldarale at unisys.com> wrote: >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Haishan >> Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about Pre-RA-schedule in LLVM3.3 > >> My clang version is 3.3 and debug build. > >> //test.c >> int a[6] = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

Hi List(s) I'm in the process of configuring a new PDC using Samba 2.2.5. At the present time we have 9 other Samba PDCs in nonconnected sites. In the next few months, these sites will become part of a WAN and we're looking to migrate authentication for these servers to a single box, for obvious administration benefits. The client base is primarily Win2k, SP2 & SP3. Now I'm

Hi Everyone, Can I suggest a couple of new `codes' methods. I know codes is a bit dodgy (at least, according to the comments in codes.factor), but for what it's worth I like to extract codes from data frames of factors, for which the following two functions (which operate recursively) are helpful: "codes.default" <- function(x) { if (is.list(x)) lapply(x, codes)

Hi, Newbie alert on for loops... I have a bunch of data.frames built using rbind that have repeated values in the EnTime column. I want to read the value in the EnTime column and use it as an input to a function, but only down to the first occurrence of the string "(all)" where I want to break off and do other things. From the results I'm getting from some test code I clearly

On 12/5/18 9:51 AM, Andrew Savonichev via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to get AA results for two pointers, but it seems that AA >> cannot look though a memcpy. For example: >> >> define dso_local spir_func void @fun() { >> entry: >> ; Store an address of `var' >> %var = alloca i32, align 4 >>

Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with that patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause unexpected behavior when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't