search for: presumpt

...Hart <jhart at kevla.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. >> 16GB??? >> > > > Jay, it helps us help you when you give more information. > > I have CentOS 7 running happily on 4GB. My presumption - based on > experience, extrapolation, and google - is that it will also run with 64TB. > > Anything between those numbers should be good. > > Cheers > L. L, The use of this machine would be as a home server running as a web and email server, two users, light use. My current...

...gt; > I think these changes would solve the thing. > > ... > -EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp; > +EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp =NULL; > ... > > -? ? if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) > +? ? if (status != EFI_SUCCESS || sbp == NULL) >? ? ? ? goto free_binding; > ... The presumption was that we'd see an error rather than non-error from LibLocateHandle() when nr_handles is 0 and be guaranteed to find a matching handle.? Your additional measures seem the best choice. -- -Gene <<< OK I have adopted this code approach; testing it since last week, so far so go...

Does anyone understand the purpose of : TargetRegisterInfo::getMinimalPhysRegClass ??? Why is there the presumption to use the minimal subclass? For Mips, it would work for me if we changed this to a virtual function and then I could override this to have it chose the proper register class based on the processor. I want to introduct a different register class for MIPS 16 but don't want it to chose MI...

...E_BINDING *sbp; >> > +EFI_SERVICE_BINDING *sbp =NULL; >> > ... >> > >> > - if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) >> > + if (status != EFI_SUCCESS || sbp == >> NULL) >> > goto free_binding; >> > ... >> >> The presumption was that we'd see an error rather than >> non-error from LibLocateHandle() when nr_handles is 0 and be guaranteed >> to find a >> matching handle. Your additional measures seem the best choice. >> -- >> -Gene >> <<< >> >> OK I hav...

...ource version available from CRAN is 3.0.1. I just wanted to check that I am not doing something stupid (like maybe using an incorrect repository). I presume that the latest version of R is available as a binary only for the last version (or last few versions) of Fedora. Can anyone confirm my presumption? No biggie. I can build from source, and indeed have done so. But downloading a binary is quicker and I'd just like to get straight what the true state of play is. cheers, Rolf Turner

...se for such important programs as BIND et al? A similar problem (to BZ561299) was first reported five (5) years ago on the isc.org mailing list. Is there any support among the CentOS community for a REPO of current vintage for such important functions as BIND et al? That question is based on the presumption that time is taking us to a more complete and correct implementation of the basic functions like DNS. IOW, is CentOS philosophy of tracking RH so nailed-to-the-wall that it is blasphemy to propose a REPO of current editions of certain very important functions? kind regards/ldv A quote from a...

...that no other end point will answer the request. I suppose manually executing Hangup() justifies the first statement but it's the last sentence that bothers me: "returned only if the client (Asterisk) knows that no other end point will answer the request" That's a little presumptive of the Asterisk system, don't you think? ;) While I don't have any better alternative responses I'm just bothered by the "global" nature of 6xx failures in the first place. Any thoughts? -- Kristian Kielhofner http://www.astlinux.org http://blog.krisk.org http://www.s...

On May 14, 2012, at 1:02 PM, reed kotler wrote: > Does anyone understand the purpose of : > > TargetRegisterInfo::getMinimalPhysRegClass ??? Barely. > Why is there the presumption to use the minimal subclass? The function can be traced back to a time when men were men and registers belonged to ONE register class. That concept doesn't make sense any longer, as LLVM supports and aggressively uses overlapping register classes. I changed the meaning of the function to b...

On 17 Mar 2015, at 13:11, Tyro Software <softwaretyro at gmail.com> wrote: > > As an alternative to fixing the "char == 8 bits" presumption would using non-uniform pointer types have been another possible approach, e.g. keep char as 8 bit but have char* encode both the word address and the byte location within it (i.e. one extra bit in this 16-bit case). Of course this is only a less intrusive (to LLVM) approach if LLVM readily supp...

R 1.4.0 ?stars has scale: logical flag: if `TRUE', the columns of the data matrix are scaled independently so that the maximum value in each column is 1 and the minimum is 0. If `FALSE', the presumption is that the data have been scaled by some other algorithm to the range [0,1]. but the code has if (scale) { x <- sweep(x, 2, apply(x, 2, max), FUN = "/") x[is.na(x)] <- 0 } and so just linearly (not affinely) scales the maximum to on...

How to force R to print 2 decimal places in column of a data.frame? I tried to do so: x = inp(format(rounf(inp$Tamanho, 2), nsmall = 2),) where "INP" is data.frame and "Size" is the name of column. But has error: Error in eval.with.vis(expr, envir, enclos) : could not find function "inp" Lesandro Veja quais s?o os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados

After setting up Samba 3 I noticed the Windows 2000 box was requesting a ticket from the KDC for HOST/<NETBIOS NAME>@MYREALM.COM when it tried to connect to the Samba server. I presume that W2K is sending the ticket it is granted along to the Samba server. If that presumption is correct, is it possible to make Samba authenticate the user with the Kerberos ticket they present? If so, how do I need to configure Samba and supporting software? I've got an MIT KDC set up in Linux along with OpenLDAP. Linux (Red Hat 8.0) is quite happily doing Kerberos authenticatio...

Hello, What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. 16GB??? Thanks, Jay

>>> Jeff, Patrick: Could you try my code from my github repo branch efi-multinic?? It's derived from Patrick's code and I finally see good responses with a VMware VM's e1000e NIC (never saw ANYTHING good from it until now). git://github.com/geneC/syslinux.git https://github.com/geneC/syslinux.git -- -Gene <<< Hi there I think in the case of a particular

...> //end test.dump > >It appears you have a typo in the above, since the generated array reference offsets do not correspond to the code in test.c. Presumably, the last array reference in test.c was really from a[3], not a[5].I'm sorry for making a mistake in the above test.c. And your presumption is right. > >> However, for 3th and 4th instructions, they should be allocated different >> register from the second instruction. > >Why? > > - Chuck > Thank you for your answer.If 3th and 4th instructions are allocated different register from the second instructio...

...her Samba PDCs in nonconnected sites. In the next few months, these sites will become part of a WAN and we're looking to migrate authentication for these servers to a single box, for obvious administration benefits. The client base is primarily Win2k, SP2 & SP3. Now I'm making the presumption that Samba + LDAP is the right path to go down in this type of situation, correct me if I'm wrong, I've only been looking into this for the past week or so, and yes I've been reading the Samba docs and the OpenLDAP docs, so don't tell me to RTFM :), I'm just after real world...

...ile) still applies, of course! Note that using codes on an array will produce a vector as the dim attribute is lost, eg codes(matrix(1:12, 3, 4)) # shocking! but although I toyed with the idea of mapping matrices to data frames in the default function I thought in the end that this was making a presumption about the interpretation of the rows and columns that was not justified. After all, you could still do codes(as.data.frame(matrix(1:12, 3, 4))) if the presumption *was* justified. Cheers, Jonathan. Jonathan Rougier Science Laboratories Department of Mathematical Scienc...

...#39;s the right way to do this sort of thing. Clearly my first for loop isn't a success! for(n in SystemResults$EnTime) { if(SystemResults$EnTime[n] == "(all)") break) X = SystemResults$EnTime[n] print(X) } What I hoped to see was 853 906 919 932 945 ... 1234 1247 1300 My presumption was that I would eventually use X as the input to another function that does the work I want to do but this prints so much garbage that I'm clearly in the dark. Thanks in advance to anyone able to straighten me out. Cheers, Mark

...t easier for AA, but I'd like to get the analysis working for > not-optimized IR as well. Hi, Andrew, To be clear, you'd like BasicAA to look back, not just trough the memcpy, but also through the loads and stores of the addresses? BasicAA currently doesn't do any of that under the presumption that, once SROA, InstCombine, etc. do promotion and simplification, AA will be able to understand the rest. Can you say more about the use case? Thanks, Hal > -- Hal Finkel Lead, Compiler Technology and Programming Languages Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory

Hi folks I've tried asking this in private mail for quite some time, but sadly got no reply. So I end up needing to raise the question here. Sangoma's s setup process includes a small patch to Zaptel. I have some technical reservations with that patch. It seems that under certain circumstances it may cause unexpected behavior when used with other Zaptel channel drivers. I also don't