search for: presumming

We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver contract around dma_resv. Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end. Aside from "it compiles" entirely untested unfortunately. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver contract around dma_resv. Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end. Aside from "it compiles" entirely untested unfortunately. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver contract around dma_resv. Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end. Aside from "it compiles" entirely untested unfortunately. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

Hi Timo et all. At last I found with unix socket wouldn't connect and it works now. However after auth, imap crashes with signal 6. This happens on 1 machine, the other (unixware too) work fine. The stack trace doesn't make much sense here it is anway... Core image of imap (process p1) created CORE FILE [makedev in cmd-status.c@sys/mkdev.h] SIGNALED 8 (fpe code[FPE_INTDIV]

We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver contract around dma_resv. Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end. Aside from "it compiles" entirely untested unfortunately. Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:50:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even > for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver > contract around dma_resv. > > Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by > pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end. >

On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 06:38:00PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We can't copy_*_user while holding reservations, that will (soon even > for nouveau) lead to deadlocks. And it breaks the cross-driver > contract around dma_resv. > > Fix this by adding a slowpath for when we need relocations, and by > pushing the writeback of the new presumed offsets to the very end. >

There is an rsync/popt/config.log in CVS - presumably an accidental "cvs add". Max.

Just a few bug-reports, before I forget: - A Windows installer bug for 4.06 and presumably 5.00-pre9 whereby the ADV contains backslashes. Reproduced with: syslinux.exe --directory \two\dirs e: - An open() (?) bug for 4.06 and presumably 5.00-pre9 whereby the filename /ubcd/custom/syslinux-5.00-pre9/com32/gplinclude/acpi/facs.h fails to open() after 134 iterations in a loop where it's

From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> Commit de7b7d59d54852c introduced tiled GART, but a linear copy is still performed. This may result in errors on eviction, fix it by checking tiling from memtype. Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at canonical.com> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org #3.10+ --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 33

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:47:39PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Ah nice. That could be spun out as a seperate patch to optimize the existing > ticket locks I presume. Yes I suppose we can do something similar for the ticket and patch in the right increment. We'd need to restructure the code a bit, but its not fundamentally impossible. We could equally apply the head hashing to

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 03:47:39PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > Ah nice. That could be spun out as a seperate patch to optimize the existing > ticket locks I presume. Yes I suppose we can do something similar for the ticket and patch in the right increment. We'd need to restructure the code a bit, but its not fundamentally impossible. We could equally apply the head hashing to

I am, from a front end, calling functions like LLVMModuleCreateWithName, found in Core.h, ultimately calling LLVMWriteBitcodeToFile, found in BitWriter.h. Do I correctly presume, from the existence of LLVMDisposeModule, that I am responsible for calling it when I'm done? Will I need to do deeper disposing myself? I presume at least I will need to free strings I allocated myself, such as the

I'm reading in ~3 years worth of data that includes hourly timestamps. Presumably to avoid DST confusion, all the data is in PST time zone -- no discontinuities in the spring or fall. The data comes in a csv file, which I'm reading with myvariable <- read.csv("my_data_file.csv",header=FALSE,

On 13 January 2015 at 08:21, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: | Where should the package source be downloaded from? I see it in CRAN (but presumably the latest version that causes the issue is not yet downloadable) and in github. The "presumable" assumption is incorrect AFAIK. The error should presumably came up in both versions as annoylib.h did not change there. Feel free to prove me wrong :)

this is not an important question, but I wonder why lm returns an error, and whether this can be shut off. it would seem to me that returning NA's would make more sense in some cases---after all, the problem is clearly that coefficients cannot be computed. I know that I can trap the lm.fit() error---although I have always found this to be quite inconvenient---and this is easy if I have only

Hi, FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will soon? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0604.html http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-3694 cheers, -- Joel Hatton -- Infrastructure Manager | Hotline: +61 7 3365 4417 AusCERT - Australia's national

I have finally gotten off the pot and finished writing up my new CPUID/MSR driver, which contains support for registers that need arbitrary GPRs touched. For i386 vs x86-64 compatibility, both use an x86-64 register image (16 64-bit register fields); this allows 32-bit userspace to access the full 64-bit image if the kernel is 64 bits. Anyway, this presumably requires new paravirtualization

I have finally gotten off the pot and finished writing up my new CPUID/MSR driver, which contains support for registers that need arbitrary GPRs touched. For i386 vs x86-64 compatibility, both use an x86-64 register image (16 64-bit register fields); this allows 32-bit userspace to access the full 64-bit image if the kernel is 64 bits. Anyway, this presumably requires new paravirtualization

Following on from this thread: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2010-September/052704.html <https://owa2010.webfusion.com/owa/redir.aspx?C=a447887e3d204944a8c766142df41453&URL=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dovecot.org%2flist%2fdovecot%2f2010-September%2f052704.html> in 2.0.16 I am seeing the same issues. I believe this would be related to some timeouts set on our mysql servers which are pretty