search for: presumbly

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "presumbly".

Did you mean: presumably
2009 Sep 28
1
lattice's mai/mar analog
hello, is there a way to control figure margins using package lattice, similarly to parameters mai/mar (which presumbly works only for figures of package graphics)? thanks!‎ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2016 Apr 09
2
Note: no visible definition
On 4/9/16 10:54 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On 9 April 2016 at 10:28, Mick Jordan wrote: > | Can someone explain a message of this form from an rscript execution: > | > | Note: no visible global function definition for 'foo' > | > | > | This happens right at the start of execution. 'foo' is only executed in > | a branch of an 'if' that is not
2016 Apr 09
0
Note: no visible definition
...hat is even trying to > find the symbol in an execution path that doesn't reference it. I'm not > sure what you mean by codetools, but is it examining my source code > somehow before it is executed? That would be unexpected at best. That message comes from the compiler package, so presumbly you (or Rscript) are trying to compile something. You can't have undefined references in compiled code. Duncan Murdoch
2011 Mar 07
1
null model for a single species?
Dear List members, I would like to test whether an observed occupancy of lakes in a landscape has occurred randomly (by chance) or not. How can I do that? The problem is that it concerns only a single species and I would like to use binary data only. At first I thought of generating null models and test the observed occupancy against the randomly generated one. However, this needs more than one
2005 Oct 31
1
[R] unvectorized option for outer()
...still be functionally compatible with what we have now so > all existing > >> software would continue to run correctly yet would not cause > >> problems for the unwary. Existing software would not have > to be changed > >> to add VECTORIZED=TRUE except for those, presumbly few, cases > >> where outer performance is critical. One optimization might be to > >> have the default be TRUE if the function is * or perhaps > if its specified > >> as a single character and FALSE otherwise. > >> > >> Having used APL I always re...