search for: presumaly

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "presumaly".

Did you mean: presumably
2019 Aug 20
2
CUPS job handling
Hi, is it somehow possible to make CUPS automatically redirect jobs, and following jobs, away from printers which can not print them to other printers that can print them until the printers that couldn't print them are again able to print them? Like I have a bunch of label printers which are all the same, and all of which are prone to run out of labels or out of ribbon every now and then.
2019 Sep 01
4
CUPS job handling
...other > > printers that can print them until the printers that couldn't print > > them are again able to print them? > > IIRC CUPS has printer classes or some such thing. > A user can send a job to a class and CUPS will > direct it within that class as it sees fit. > Presumaly if one printer is stil chewing on last week's job, > CUPS will see fit to direct subsequent jobs elsewhere. Well, yes, and I am not sure (at least not yet) if print jobs for a class are diverted to other members of the class or not. It seems that data kept in the printer buffer and in the...
2019 Aug 22
0
CUPS job handling
...inters which can not print them to other > printers that can print them until the printers that couldn't print > them are again able to print them? IIRC CUPS has printer classes or some such thing. A user can send a job to a class and CUPS will direct it within that class as it sees fit. Presumaly if one printer is stil chewing on last week's job, CUPS will see fit to direct subsequent jobs elsewhere. -- Michael hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin.&quo...
2011 Mar 22
2
lm ~ v1 + log(v1) + ... improve adj Rsq ¿any sense?
Dear all, I want to improve my adj - R sq. I 've chequed some established models and they introduce two times the same variable, one transformed, and the other not. It also improves my adj - R sq. But, isn't this bad for the collinearity? Do I interpret coefficients as usual? Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.73140 7.22477 0.240