Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "presice".
Did you mean:
predice
2019 Feb 26
2
gpo not applied a boot computer
Sorry for the translation.
actually my first installation is a samba put into production, to
avoid errors, I cloned on a new VM not to break my current system.
on this one I redid an installation with DEB packages
"https://dev.tranquil.it" I then made a restoration.
I presice that the supply is a samba3 pdc migration to samba4 dc
"samba-tool domain samba3upgrade".
I only have one DC at the moment.
I checked the database with "dbcheck", no problems.
if the machine is newly joined on the domain the gpo computer works
the first time, but not the other...
2019 Feb 26
0
gpo not applied a boot computer
...y native tongue ;-) )
> actually my first installation is a samba put into production, to
> avoid errors, I cloned on a new VM not to break my current system.
> on this one I redid an installation with DEB packages
> "https://dev.tranquil.it" I then made a restoration.
> I presice that the supply is a samba3 pdc migration to samba4 dc
> "samba-tool domain samba3upgrade".
>
> I only have one DC at the moment.
> I checked the database with "dbcheck", no problems.
I understand now, you are trying to upgrade to AD and are in the
testing phase....
2006 Aug 24
0
ca.po Pz test question
Hello,
I have a few questions about & Ouliaris Unit Root Test of type Pz
1) I noticed that critical values given in the article "Asymptotic properties of residual..." by Phillips and Ouliaris are different from those given by R. More presicely - they are swaped with each other. Could explain why?
2) that question is quite stupid. Can you explain what coefficients for test Pz mean?
for Pu it is straight-forward - Var1~ Var2*k1 + intercept +u. and u is tested for having a unit root.
for Pz there it looks like
Coefficients:...
2007 Jan 25
1
Substring error
Hi,
Do anybody know when and why the below error we get?
Error in substr(x, as.integer(start), as.integer(stop)) :
invalid substring argument(s) in substr()
Thanks in advance,
Shubha
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2007 Apr 07
0
[LLVMdev] Register Alias Sets
...eady said it'd get us into a little overhead on each alias
set operation (I mean without modifying its code, of course). I believe
other allocators check alias sets as well (indirectly, may be).
However, I'm only a user of LLVM's target definitions. May be, someone'll
give you more presice, correct and complete answer.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070407/4692c22e/attachment.html>
2019 Feb 26
2
gpo not applied a boot computer
compiled samba version : 4.8.5 and my distribution is: debian stretch 9.6
I said that when I join the domain, restarting the machine takes the GPO,
the other restart does not take the gpo computer.
Thanks for your help
Le mar. 26 févr. 2019 à 17:11, Rowland Penny via samba <
samba at lists.samba.org> a écrit :
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:37:39 +0100
> David Jehin <bedou210977 at
2007 Apr 06
5
[LLVMdev] Register Alias Sets
I notice that in X86GenRegisterInfo.inc, the AliasSets do not
include the register being queried. For example:
const unsigned RAX_AliasSet[] = { X86::EAX, X86::AX, X86::AL, X86::AH,
0 };
const unsigned EAX_AliasSet[] = { X86::RAX, X86::AX, X86::AL,
X86::AH, 0 };
This makes it hard to do set comparisons. RAX and EAX really have
equivalent alias sets but one wouldn't know that from