Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "preservestacktrac".
Did you mean:
preservestacktraces
2013 Dec 03
0
[LLVMdev] Disabling certain optimizations at -O1?
Renato,
I'm not sure I follow. By #pragma, do you mean a C-level thing? By
table of flags, some hypothetical place where the proposed
"Simple|Speed|Space|Aggressive" setting lives, accessible by IR
passes? Sounds like what Philip needs is a more specific
PreserveStackTraces setting in the same place, that's on by default at
-O1, and overridable by some find of -fpreserve-stack-traces Clang
command-line flag.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 2 December 2013 20:12, Philip Reames <listmail at philip...
2013 Dec 02
3
[LLVMdev] Disabling certain optimizations at -O1?
On 2 December 2013 20:12, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote:
> Would it make sense to separate our a flag for preserving full and exactly
> stack traces? Using -O1 is one option, but it would be nice to move beyond
> -O1 with reasonable confidence that stack traces would be preserved. Would
> others be interested in such a feature?
I can't say I'm