search for: prerequisites

...it/syslinux/efi64/com32/gpllib/libgpl.c32'. Looking for a rule with intermediate file '/home/john/git/syslinux/efi64/com32/gpllib/libgpl.c32'. Avoiding implicit rule recursion. Avoiding implicit rule recursion. No implicit rule found for 'hello.c32'. Finished prerequisites of target file 'hello.c32'. Must remake target 'hello.c32'. make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'hello.c32', needed by 'all'. Stop. make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/john/git/syslinux/efi64/com32/samples' Reaping losing child 0x1112500 PID 22647 /home/joh...

Hi: I've been seeing intermittent build failures with the extlinux target, and I believe I've tracked it down to a VPATH issue. See this make -d log: Finished prerequisites of target file `extlinux'. Prerequisite `extlinux.o' is newer than target `extlinux'. Prerequisite `setadv.o' is newer than target `extlinux'. Prerequisite `extlinux_bss_bin.o' is newer than target `extlinux'. Prerequisite `extlinux_sys_bin.o' is...

...;your pass name>). If you're building a separate program that schedules the passes, then it needs to run the prerequisite passes first. See the sc tool in the SAFECode source code for an example. 2) For prerequisite *analysis* passes (like LoopInfo), your ModulePass can declare them as prerequisites and get access to them using the getAnalysis<PassName>(Function *) method. This is documented in the "Writing an LLVM Pass" manual (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#getAnalysis). -- John T. > void MyPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { >...

...er will be used. When calling plugin >> +functions during C<.prepare>, the filter must ensure that prerequisite >> +functions have succeeded (for example, calling C<.pwrite>) requires >> +checking both C<.get_size> and C<.can_write>); while these >> +prerequisites are automatically handled in most other cases thanks to >> +client negotiation, the timing of C<.prepare> comes before client >> +negotiation has completed. > > I think this isn't sufficient. I think a filter which does: > > int64_t my_filter_get_size () { re...

On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:05 PM, John Criswell wrote: > If you write your pass as a ModulePass, then you can iterate over the > functions in any order that you want. I had considered that, but my FunctionPass depends on other passes processing the functions first: void MyPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const { AU.addRequired<UnifyFunctionExitNodes>();

...issues. make[3]: Entering directory `/home/gene/s/g/bios/memdump' gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: warning: NUL character seen; rest of line ignored gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: *** missing separator. Stop. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gene/s/g/bios/memdump' make[2]: *** [memdump] Error 2 2) For recursive prerequisites, is it better to list the directory as a prerequisite (simple and current approach) or would it be better to have a more complex set of rules like the following: --In com32/Makefile: lib/libcom32.c32 lib/libcom32min.a lib/libcom32core.a: lib libutil/libutil.c32: libutil --In com32/rosh/Makefile:...

...e prerequisite passes first. What?? Sure it does. See all the passes which require BreakCritEdges or LCSSA for examples. > > See the sc tool in the SAFECode source code for an example. > > 2) For prerequisite *analysis* passes (like LoopInfo), your ModulePass > can declare them as prerequisites and get access to them using the > getAnalysis<PassName>(Function *) method. This is documented in the > "Writing an LLVM Pass" manual > (http://llvm.org/docs/WritingAnLLVMPass.html#getAnalysis). > > -- John T. > >> void MyPass::getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsag...

...t;.open>, declaring how this filter will be used. When calling plugin +functions during C<.prepare>, the filter must ensure that prerequisite +functions have succeeded (for example, calling C<.pwrite>) requires +checking both C<.get_size> and C<.can_write>); while these +prerequisites are automatically handled in most other cases thanks to +client negotiation, the timing of C<.prepare> comes before client +negotiation has completed. There is no C<next_ops-E<gt>prepare> or C<next_ops-E<gt>finalize>. Unlike other filter methods, prepare and finaliz...

...red >> gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: *** missing separator. Stop. >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gene/s/g/bios/memdump' >> make[2]: *** [memdump] Error 2 >> > > Oops. My bad. I wondered which was the error (the include or the gcc test rule) >> 2) For recursive prerequisites, is it better to list the directory as >> a prerequisite (simple and current approach) or would it be better to >> have a more complex set of rules like the following: >> >> --In com32/Makefile: >> lib/libcom32.c32 lib/libcom32min.a lib/libcom32core.a: lib >> lib...

Hi, I'm trying to configure samba 4.13.2 bot receive this messages Checking for dbus : not found vfs_snapper is enabled but prerequisite dbus-1 package not found. Use --with-shared-modules=!vfs_snapper to disable vfs_snapper support. (complete log in /srv/samba-4.13.2/bin/config.log) What is wrong?? try this: ./configure --enable-fhs --prefix=/usr --sbindir=/usr/sbin

Hi (1)In polr(), is there any way to calculate a pseudo analogue to the R^2. Just for use as a purely descriptive statistic of the goodness of fit? (2) And: what are the assumptions which must be fulfilled, so that the results of polr() (t-values, etc.) are valid? How can I test these prerequisites most easily: I have a three-level (ordered factor) response and four metric variables. many thanks Christoph -- Christoph Lehmann <christoph.lehmann at gmx.ch>

Hello everybody, almost one year ago, there was a short discussion about certain resources which are intended to happen before any other resources (see [1] and replies). To quickly summarize it: There may be some few tasks (like creating some files required for installing any packet on a gentoo system, or mounting a nfs share needed by subsequent installation/copy tasks). Back then, the outcome

...ng how this filter will be used. When calling plugin > +functions during C<.prepare>, the filter must ensure that prerequisite > +functions have succeeded (for example, calling C<.pwrite>) requires > +checking both C<.get_size> and C<.can_write>); while these > +prerequisites are automatically handled in most other cases thanks to > +client negotiation, the timing of C<.prepare> comes before client > +negotiation has completed. I think this isn't sufficient. I think a filter which does: int64_t my_filter_get_size () { return size; } int my_filter_...

...t without it, the 'std::to_string' definitions are not enabled! -----Original Message----- From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: 06 July 2016 19:35 To: Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com Cc: LLVM Developers <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? On 6 July 2016 at 19:02, Martin J. O'Riordan <martin.oriordan at movidius.com> wrote: > I am actually getting the same problem with GCC v4.9.3 on CentOS, but for both Cygwin and Linux adding '-D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99' to the '-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING='...

Commit 4a16dd9d18a0 ("drm/nouveau/kms: switch to drm fbdev helpers") converted nouveau to generic fbdev emulation. Also remove the internal implementation from the driver. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> Fixes: 4a16dd9d18a0 ("drm/nouveau/kms: switch to drm fbdev helpers") Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Cc:

...AGS:STRING=' flag during configuration cured the problem. MartinO -----Original Message----- From: Renato Golin [mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org] Sent: 06 July 2016 11:10 To: Martin.ORiordan at movidius.com Cc: LLVM Developers <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? On 6 July 2016 at 11:04, Martin J. O'Riordan <martin.oriordan at movidius.com> wrote: > Perhaps it is a broken Cygwin v4.9.3 package, but this is odd since the source should be identical for the Cygwin versus Linux distros? Looks like a broken package. I don...

Yes! Thanks!!! that's how you say El jue., 5 nov. 2020 a las 18:42, David Disseldorp (<ddiss at samba.org>) escribi?: > Hi, > > On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:04:58 -0500, Leo C via samba wrote: > > > Hi, > > I'm trying to configure samba 4.13.2 bot receive this messages > > > > Checking for dbus : not found > > vfs_snapper is

...y `/home/gene/s/g/bios/memdump' > gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: warning: NUL character seen; rest of line ignored > gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: *** missing separator. Stop. > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gene/s/g/bios/memdump' > make[2]: *** [memdump] Error 2 > > > 2) For recursive prerequisites, is it better to list the directory as > a prerequisite (simple and current approach) or would it be better to > have a more complex set of rules like the following: > > --In com32/Makefile: > lib/libcom32.c32 lib/libcom32min.a lib/libcom32core.a: lib > libutil/libutil.c32: libut...

.../bios/memdump' > gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: warning: NUL character seen; rest of line ignored > gcc_ok.6333.tmp:1: *** missing separator. Stop. > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/gene/s/g/bios/memdump' > make[2]: *** [memdump] Error 2 > Oops. My bad. > > 2) For recursive prerequisites, is it better to list the directory as > a prerequisite (simple and current approach) or would it be better to > have a more complex set of rules like the following: > > --In com32/Makefile: > lib/libcom32.c32 lib/libcom32min.a lib/libcom32core.a: lib > libutil/libutil.c32: libut...

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:06 AM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote: > > Commit 4a16dd9d18a0 ("drm/nouveau/kms: switch to drm fbdev helpers") > converted nouveau to generic fbdev emulation. Also remove the internal > implementation from the driver. No functional changes. Looking at 4a16dd9d18a0, it appears to have removed this file already. I guess it