Displaying 20 results from an estimated 62 matches for "preprint".
Did you mean:
reprint
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
> > > > more
> > > > >>> recently in
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> > >
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> > > >
> > >
> >...
2018 Sep 19
4
Bias in R's random integers?
...> > >>>
> > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
> > > more
> > > >>> recently in
> > > >>>
> > >
> > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> > >
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> > > >>> pointing to the python...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...t;> I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
> > >>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
> > more
> > >>> recently in
> > >>>
> > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> > <
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> > >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cry...
2006 Aug 25
2
R in Nature
Hi all,
We've just had a paper accepted for publication in Nature. We used R for
95% of our analyses (one of my co-authors sneaked in some GenStat when I
wasn't looking.). The preprint is available from the Nature web site, in
the open peer-review trial section. I searched Nature for previous
references to "R Development Core Team", and I received no hits. So I
tentatively conclude that our paper is the first Nature paper to cite R.
A great many thanks to the R Deve...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...729483.html, and
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ?more
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> recently in
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>>
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >
> >? ? ? >
> >
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >
> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >? ? ? >
> >
> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley....
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...>> be addressed first?
> >>>
> >>> I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
> >>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
> >>> recently in
> >>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
> >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> >>>
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
> >>
> >> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the def...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
.../r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ?more
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> recently in
>> ???? >? ? ? >? ? ? >>>
>> ???? >? ? ? >
>> ???? >
>> ??? https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
>> ???
>> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
>> ???? >?? ????
>> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
>> ???? >? ? ? >
>> ???? >???? ????
>>...
2016 Sep 26
2
Publication & Project: Verificarlo: checking floating point accuracy through Monte Carlo Arithmetic
...g point operations.
Could you please add our paper to http://llvm.org/pubs/ ?
Verificarlo: checking floating point accuracy through Monte Carlo
Arithmetic. Christophe Denis, Pablo de Oliveira Castro, and Eric Petit.
23rd IEEE International Symposium on Computer Arithmetic (ARITH), July
2016.
The preprint is available online at
<https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01192668>.
Could you please also add our tool to http://llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM ?
Verificarlo: A tool for automatic Montecarlo Arithmetic analysis.
https://github.com/verificarlo/verificarlo
Verificarlo is an LLVM based tool...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...t;
> > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
> >? ? ? >? ? ?more
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >>> recently in
> >? ? ? >? ? ? >>>
> >? ? ? >
> >
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >
> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >? ? ? >
> >
> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley....
2018 Sep 18
3
Bias in R's random integers?
...her languages? Would
a patch providing such an algorithm be welcome? What concerns would need to
be addressed first?
I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
recently in
https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
Thanks!
Carl
--
http://carlboettiger.info
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...ised by Killie & Philip in
> >? ? ? >>>
> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
> >? ? ?more
> >? ? ? >>> recently in
> >? ? ? >>>
> >
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >
> ?<https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> >? ? ? >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...-sample-td4729483.html, and
> >> > > more
> >> > > >>> recently in
> >> > > >>>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> >>
> >> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >> >
> >> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>
> >> > >
> >> >...
2019 Feb 19
2
bias issue in sample() (PR 17494)
Before the next release we really should to sort out the bias issue in
sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in
https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and
filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494.
Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel:
set.seed(123)
m <- (2/5) * 2^32
x <- sample(m, 1000000, replace = TRUE)
table(x %...
2011 Jul 27
3
Is R the right choice for simulating first passage times of random walks?
...ou have pointers for those?
I glanced at simFrame [5] and read `?simulate` but could not understand
it right away and think that this might be overkill.
Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Paul
? AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual Core Processor BE-2350, 2,1 GHz
[1] http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~amir/preprints/irw.ps
[2] http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.5456
[3] http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-intro.html#Repetitive-execution
[4] https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Function_(mathematics)
[5] http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/library/simFrame/html/runSimulation.html
-------------- next part -----...
2018 Sep 19
0
Bias in R's random integers?
...>>
> >>> I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
> >>> http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and
> more
> >>> recently in
> >>>
> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf
> <https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/%7Estark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf>,
> >>> pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> >>>
> https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L...
2018 Sep 19
2
Bias in R's random integers?
...e welcome? What concerns would need to
> > be addressed first?
> >
> > I believe this issue was also raised by Killie & Philip in
> > http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Bug-in-sample-td4729483.html, and more
> > recently in
> > https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf,
> > pointing to the python implementation for comparison:
> > https://github.com/statlab/cryptorandom/blob/master/cryptorandom/cryptorandom.py#L265
>
> I think the analyses are correct, but I doubt if a change to the default
> is likely to be accepted as i...
2010 Jul 19
2
Help on R strucchange package
Hello,
Im using strucchange package in R software in order to apply Bai and
Peron (1998, 2003) structural break tests to a set of n=1671
observations with a constant term (no AR terms).
For that purpose I have read several papers, for instance Validating
Multiple Structural Change Models An Extended Case Study, in which
its aim is to replicate the results from Bai and Perron (2003) in R
2016 Aug 30
3
Publication of an llvm-based tool that protects against fault injection attacks
...is to automatically protect the code being compiled
against fault injection attacks
*Title:* Compilation of a Countermeasure Against Instruction-Skip Fault
Attacks
Available at the ACM Digital Library:
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858931
And also here: http://thiernobarry.fr/publications/preprint/T-Barry.pdf
Abstract:
========
Physical attacks especially fault attacks represent one of the major
threats against embedded systems. In the state of the art, software
countermeasures against fault attacks are either applied at the source
code level where it will very likely be removed at comp...
2019 Feb 26
2
bias issue in sample() (PR 17494)
...> ~G
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 11:52 AM Tierney, Luke <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> Before the next release we really should to sort out the bias issue in
>> sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in
>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and
>> filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at
>> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494.
>>
>> Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel:
>>
>> set.seed(123)
>> m <- (2/5) * 2^32...
2019 Feb 26
1
bias issue in sample() (PR 17494)
...2019 at 11:52 AM Tierney, Luke <luke-tierney at uiowa.edu>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Before the next release we really should to sort out the bias issue in
>>>> sample() reported by Ottoboni and Stark in
>>>> https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/r-random-issues.pdf and
>>>> filed aa a bug report by Duncan Murdoch at
>>>> https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17494.
>>>>
>>>> Here are two examples of bad behavior through current R-devel:
>>>>
>>>> ?????...