Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "prepareforthintlo".
Did you mean:
prepareforthinlto
2018 Mar 30
1
Proper way to do thinlto (from code)
Thanks!
I'll create a wrapper for WriteBitcodePass. Do I still need the
PrepareForThinTLO pass or is the writeBitCodePass enough?
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, at 10:02, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> You need to make sure that your bitcode file has a module summary
> index. You can do that either by creating a WriteBitcodePass with
> EmitSummaryIndex set to true or by calling WriteBitc...
2018 Mar 30
0
Proper way to do thinlto (from code)
You need to make sure that your bitcode file has a module summary index.
You can do that either by creating a WriteBitcodePass with EmitSummaryIndex
set to true or by calling WriteBitcodeToFile with a module summary index
that you created yourself. It doesn't look like either of those options are
hooked up to the c API, though.
Peter
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018, 00:50 Carlo Kok via llvm-dev
2018 Mar 30
2
Proper way to do thinlto (from code)
I'm using llvm-c (but if needed can call c++ stuff too if nedeed);
what's the proper way to emit bitcode with thinlto info so the linker
can parallelize ?I'm currently using:
unwrap(PMB)->PrepareForThinLTO = b;
on the pass manager builder, but that doesn't seem to be enough?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: