Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "premkiran".
2008 Feb 18
2
Speex Resampler quality
...n I use speex_resampler_skip_zeros() for 44100 to 48000 conversion, I
got a very bad quality value when I used PEAQ. Do you suggest me not to use
this function for fractional rate conversions?
Regards,
*
On Feb 15, 2008 2:23 AM, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin@usherbrooke.ca>
wrote:
> Premkiran Mannava a ?crit :
> > I just built a sample application with speex resampler in linux and I
> > tried to resample 8K sine wave tone mono to 48k using
> > speex_resample_process_int. I am using a tool called EAQUAL for audio
> > quality.
>
> That's in general not v...
2008 Feb 14
2
Speex Resampler quality
Hi,
I just built a sample application with speex resampler in linux and I tried
to resample 8K sine wave tone mono to 48k using speex_resample_process_int.
I am using a tool called EAQUAL for audio quality. I find the quality of
Speex resampler to be decreasing when I increase the quality q of the
resampler init function. Can some one give me pointers regarding this?? As
per the API, if the
2008 Feb 14
0
Speex Resampler quality
Premkiran Mannava a ?crit :
> I just built a sample application with speex resampler in linux and I
> tried to resample 8K sine wave tone mono to 48k using
> speex_resample_process_int. I am using a tool called EAQUAL for audio
> quality.
That's in general not very reliable. You can get P...
2008 Feb 18
0
Speex Resampler quality
On 2/18/08, Premkiran Mannava <loverays@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> *"That's in general not very reliable. You can get PEAQ to say all sorts
> of silly things."
>
> Can you provide me links for any more effective tools other than PEAQ?
> Which is more reliable for Speex resa...