search for: prelinked

I am running a Xen installation on a Centos-4.4 based test box, my desktop unit, and I am having intermittent problems installing certain pieces of software. Some time back I posted to this list regarding my inability to install Adobe Acrobat on this unit and was advised to essentially repackage the software and try again. This is beyond my present means of knowledge or time to acquire same and

I have a number of CentOS6 machines, and on one of them, the daily prelink cron job aborts. Any ideas what to look for? /etc/cron.daily/prelink: /etc/cron.daily/prelink: line 47: 9381 Aborted (core dumped) /usr/sbin/prelink -av $PRELINK_OPTS >> /var/log/prelink/prelink.log 2>&1 I'm unfamiliar with prelink, so I'm not sure what to look for in the logs.

On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from >> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning

Can anybody explain to me what's going on here? This is a CentOS 4 i386 system. [root at edison ~]# rm -f /etc/prelink.cache [root at edison ~]# /etc/cron.daily/prelink [root at edison ~]# rpm -qf /usr/bin/sqlite3 sqlite-3.3.6-2 [root at edison ~]# rpm --verify sqlite prelink: /usr/bin/sqlite3: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?.....

Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] All file hash checks will be skipped because: This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not look like SHA1 or MD5. Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run rkhunter --propupd. Works. And then,

Hi All, Does anyone knows what doest this output means? [root@serverxen ~]# xm list Name                                      ID Mem(MiB) VCPUs State   Time(s) Domain-0                                   0     3202     8 r-----   5220.1 vm1                                  3     4095     2 -b----   3529.2 vm2                                  5     8191     4 -b----    399.0 [root@serverxen ~]# xm

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:03 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > > > Can't remember if I posted this before...

So, what does this do? # cat /etc/prelink.conf.d/skype.conf -b /usr/bin/skype -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax:

In short, the reason considering (and still only considering) turning it off is to make tripwire usable again (security vs. performance, I guess). Is it possible to completely turn it off system-wide? Any additional steps needed on the existing system (that already have half of the binaries prelinked)? What order of performance degradation to expect? If it is minor, nobody is going to cry about it. My old RH 7.3 systems don't have prelinking, and I don't see them being any slower than FC2 and newer systems that have prelinking... -----------------------------------------------------...

in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu> wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting

What are the pros and cons of disabling prelinking in CentOS 4? From what I understand, prelinking is ment to be performance improvement (faster loading time for binaries). I can see some potential benefit on workstations where many different processes are started frequently. But how big is that benefit in real life? Would I slow down things noticably if there is no prelinking? Is

Here's another data point regarding the GDM problem I'm having. Once again, I get this on the console: There was an error loading the theme Default Couldn't recognize the image file format for file '/usr/share/gdm/themes/Default/background.png' Yesterday I needed to edit some graphics I had done for a job. I use gimp. Now gimp tells me: Image type 'png' is not

On Sep 8, 2006, at 5:58 AM, Thorsten Sandfuchs wrote: > hio, > as I have some huge files to distribute and md5-sum-checking takes > SOME time > for them, I''m trying to switch to mtime/timestamps, but got no > luck. Regularly > the mtime seems to change and additionally the md5sums generate > themselves > anyway. I''m pretty sure that the file

Hi, I am using Debian GNU/Linux Lenny with kernel verison 2.6.26-2-amd64 (x86_64) and want to compile wine 1.1.38 form the source Tarball. After successful compilation and installation through "make install", I get the following error when trying to run wine (e.g. when trying to run winecfg or any other application). wine: failed to initialize: /usr/local/lib/wine/ntdll.dll.so:

Greetings, I'm experiencing in issue with the latest Wine on Fedora Core 4, latest kernel and all latest drivers available. I'm attempting to run World of Warcraft, after compiling a custom build of wine, with instructions outlined at http://wiki.kaspersandberg.com/doku.php?id=howtos:wine:worldofwarcraft Everything compiles fine, and I'm able to run wine to generat the

I have a large installer program (~400MB) that fails to run under wine (20050310). It gives me the following: err:virtual:map_image Image was mapped at 0x60640000: standard load address for a Win32 program (0x00400000) not available err:virtual:map_image Do you have exec-shield or prelink active? wine: could not load L"C:\\WebPACK_71_fcfull_i.exe" as Win32 binary The thing is that I

This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line HASH_CMD=sha1sum On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from > rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] > All file hash checks will be skipped because: > This system uses

..., when you will hang while starting init. Current solutions: 1. Don''t use TLS 2. Don''t run prelink If you are currently running with both then you''re probably running a recent Fedora Core release. If ''rpm -V glibc'' reports that libraries have been re-prelinked, then you are already toast. Delete /lib/tls for now -- you can get it back by forcing a reinstall of the glibc RPM once I''ve fixed the problem. -- Keir ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk...

Hey, Gang! To ensure that a file hasn't been corrupted or tampered with, you can use rpm to verify the package it came from. Well, I found this: rpm -Vv util-linux .... ........ /usr/bin/cal S.?..... /usr/bin/chfn ........ /usr/bin/chrt S.?..... /usr/bin/chsh .... Does anyone else get this? And what would be the proper course of action at this point? Thanks mucho. --

The above discussion of prelink gave me pause for thought... I have a "suite" of programs that I install in their own directory, along with their datafiles, under /opt. Would it be a good idea to add that directory to /etc/prelink.conf? What could go wrong? -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com