Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "preinclud".
Did you mean:
preincluded
2006 May 10
2
Is there a way to not propagate a context included inside other context?
...g the external number through the
Zap channel. Or if I switch the include order in the "full" context,
even internal calls are routed through the Zap channel!!!
I know that maybe this dialplan is not the best in this case, but my
final question is how to avoid the propagation of "preincluded" context
beyond the scope of the context that explicitaly include it.
Thanks a lot for your answer.
--
Atly.
?lvaro Palma
2009 Mar 03
0
[LLVMdev] Adding Intrinsics for custom processor (frotend problem)
...m-gcc which I prefer not to hack with (I use a binary
> precompiled one). As far as I could see it supports the
> intrinsics using gcc style __builtin_ function names.
>
> Currently what I think to do , is the following :
>
> 1. Define my intrinsics in a special (which would be preincluded in our
> build system) .h file (using whatever name convention I want)
> 2. Then I need to add a pass to llvm which will translate the names of
> those intrinsics to llvm style names , since
> LLVM intrinsics start with "llvm." which makes them non legal as "C"...
2009 Mar 03
4
[LLVMdev] Adding Intrinsics for custom processor (frotend problem)
...ted, and implemented
in llvm-gcc which I prefer not to hack with (I use a binary
precompiled one). As far as I could see it supports the
intrinsics using gcc style __builtin_ function names.
Currently what I think to do , is the following :
1. Define my intrinsics in a special (which would be preincluded in our
build system) .h file (using whatever name convention I want)
2. Then I need to add a pass to llvm which will translate the names of
those intrinsics to llvm style names , since
LLVM intrinsics start with "llvm." which makes them non legal as "C"
identifiers.
I h...