search for: preencoder

Akos Maroy <darkeye@tyrell.hu> said: > Jack Moffitt wrote: > > Icast at one point had about 456 stations or so. We were able to do > > this (all the music was preencoded) with 8 machines quite reliably. > > Basically 4 machines sourced streams, and 4 machines served them. Only > > but the source machines: did they encode live audio, or send static > files

> As a guess, how many IceCast streams could be supported on one Linux PC > (say 1.5Ghz PC). Icast at one point had about 456 stations or so. We were able to do this (all the music was preencoded) with 8 machines quite reliably. Basically 4 machines sourced streams, and 4 machines served them. Only three machines were really needed, so failures were taken care of if only one machine

Hello all, I've been working a little inside the Theora decoder when I found that it seems that many videos had the very same huffman tables encoded into their bitstreams (at least the ones that I could take my time to dissecate). I found that the tables are listed as TH_VP31_HUFF_CODES in the file huffenc.c. I tried to investigate a little bit more to see who was setting the bitstream

Hi, all I am a pabx vendor from Singapore. Recently we are going to implement a failover solution for our customers using heartbeat, the asterisk server can failover perfectly, however the g729 codec canot work, because it is binded the mac address, we have bought two set of licenses, can you provide us some workaround for this scenario? Regards, Liangliang

Does anyone know how to maximize music on hold quality on calls inbound from PSTN? I know that it is common to have choppy and static sounding music on hold when connecting via PSTN but how can that be minimized? I assume that the bitrates, type of music, etc can minimize the effects. Does anyone have any experience in this area? Do you know where I should look for more information?

This is a stupid question... Why would one use a streaming audio server versus just a web server to stream static files like a juke box? Here are some reasons I came up with: 1) A web server won't concatinate songs together, but if someone is only downloading say a one-off clip, perhaps a web server is exactly what is needed 2) Titles (or rather meta-data) don't get inserted into the

Hi I've just become involved in a company that is starting a new large project which involves streaming thousands of Internet radio stations, possibly up to 8000. They were heading towards the Windows Media format but I mentioned Ogg Vorbis streaming and they are interested. This will be a major boost to Ogg Vorbis in the market place if they decide to do it. I'm not exactly sure

Hello again No replies regarding memory requirements! I have an idea to provide 1000's of streams without the requirement of 100's of source PC's, and perhaps without even requiring Icecast at all. But I'm not sure if this will work. We will have thousands of 24 hour playlists generated everyday by software I'm developing. If we encode all our audio files at 32kb/s, could