search for: predominant

Does anyone have any experience with running asterisk on multi-processor computers (dual or quad)? Does asterisk on the latest Linux distros take advantage of the extra processors, or does it predominately utilize a single processor?

Hello, I'm a admin over at Harvard University and I have quite a few users that use R predominately over VNC. In the past this has not been an issue, but after upgrading to R 2.0.0 they can no longer use RCmdr over VNC. When trying to use the package, they see the following: > library("Rcmdr") Loading required package: tcltk Loading required package: zoo Loading required

...moment, it doesn't offer an indexing service that is compatible with Windows Search. So, no matter how much I like Samba, if I need this feature, I have no choice but to use Windows. I can't say that I'm very experienced with the file serving capabilities of Windows, having used Samba predominantly for this task, so I'm really just wondering, which other such limitations exist when comparing a file share provided by a Samba member vis-a-vis a file share on Windows server machine? It's really not about personal preference, I'm interested in those situations where Samba is simply...

Hi Inaki, > "Performant"... in terms of what. If the cost of copying the data > predominates over the computation time, maybe you didn't need > parallelization in the first place. Performant in terms of speed. There's no copying in that example using `mclapply` and so it is significantly faster than other alternatives. It is a very simple and contrived example, but

Samba friends, I work in Wal-Mart's IT department, specifically with Unix Servers of various flavors, but HP-UX is predominant in our Home Office environment. I recently built an two node HA cluster on HP 11.11 boxes. I want to be able to have Samba use the virtual name of my cluster. Currently Samba is configured to use the hardcoded box name, however if the box happens to go down, we have to go in and reconfigure th...

Just throwing my two cents in: I think removing/deprecating fork would be a bad idea for two reasons: 1) There are no performant alternatives 2) Removing fork would break existing workflows Even if replaced with something using the same interface (e.g., a function that automatically detects variables to export as in the amazing `future` package), the lack of copy-on-write functionality would

en.com On: Wed Nov 12 12:46:54 EST 2008, Mark Wilden mark at mwild wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:27 AM, James B. Byrne <byrnejb at harte- > lyne.ca> wrote: > >> Feature: Manage entities # features/manage_entities.feature >> > > This is just a side note, but is "manage entities" really a feature? It > sounds pretty vague. I''m not

I have a form which is predominantly a customer form (first name, last name, etc), if there is a form error and I render to the form from the controller the customer details are filled in correctly. The question I have is, I have some fields which are _tag fields not related to the customer model, how do I get them populated whe...

A friend pointed out this url http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/pcat/clmn32.htm where it lists intercom/auto-answer as being a feature in Cisco Call Manager (which as I understand it, uses SIP predominately for handsets). I've come across comment somewhere that intercom isn't supported in the SIP spec. Does anyone know if the apparent capability of Intercom being available in SIP

I am currently integrating Freebsd in a predominately NT network. I am interested in using NT as a domain controller then using samba on the other servers. I know that samba supports this and you can set security = server, but what I am also interested in is using the password list for the passwd file as well. So in theory I would like to download the NT user and pass list much like NT's

Talin, You're developing your own language and tool sets, it brings fresh perspective in our predominately C orientated environment, which is good. On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Talin wrote: > Is this a limitation of DWARF or of the LLVM generator? Neither, IMO. My own reading of DWARF did not find clear wording on this subject. I am not even sure if it is just a darwin gdb implementation

...all, This message is a testament to the great work samba team has done, but its also an encouragement to those of you that still not sure if samba4 will work in your environment. This semester we have moved from samba 3.0.X DC to samba4 DC for students, and things are working great The move was predominantly driven by switching from Windows XP to Windows 7 desktop platform (but also by a need for proper group policy). Our setup is quite simple and includes: One samba4 DC (running on centos 5.5 x64) with nsd dns backend Two samba 3.3.8 domain members (running on centos 5.5 x64) providing file ser...

...e (to LLVM) approach if LLVM readily supports such pointers, which may be close to asking "could 8086 small/large/huge pointers be implemented?" > > One obvious drawback to such an approach is that dereferencing char* becomes relatively expensive, though for the sort of code being predominantly run on a DSP that might be acceptable. We're using multiple address spaces to describe two pointer representations for CHERI: AS0 is a 64-bit pointer that's represented as an integer, AS200 is a capability (256-bit fat pointer with base, length, permissions, enforced in hardware). We h...

...one way or the other). I don't want to manually control files. I want to send mail to the mailbox and delete (see above) it with a client. 2) There are several examples in Peer's book and the wiki, but none seem to match what I want. (This is the problem with documentation that is predominantly example-based). I guess I need more explanation of the mechanical differences between shared and public and why one would pick one over the other. Can someone help? Please be as specific as you can. Thanks much, Michael

My former primary boot disk had some bad spots appear awhile back. Damage, per rpm --verify, seems to be predominately in loss of reference files in /usr/share/doc and such as that. Being the type that wastes my own time before wasting that of others, I did a semi-careful perusal of the rpm man pages. Thought the --files or some such might offer a way ought. IIUC, nope! Seems that I can't

Hi, Is there a known problem with file locks when Samba restarts? I have several servers happily running Samba on RH Linux, and several hundred clients running M$ Win9x. There are always a large number of open files, and I am currently migrating the data off several NT servers and onto the Samba ones. This has meant changing the smb.conf file on a regular basis. I am restarting Samba using

Hi all. A friend of mine asked me to assist with an R presentation to the Penn State LUG in a few weeks. The audience will be predominately computer scientists and/or engineers (I suspect) and they are just looking for presentations of good open source software and my friend volunteered R. We are both relatively new to R, so I thought it would be best to ask the list for your opinion....what do

I've been working with Asterisk for a little while now, and have been looking recently at my next career opportunity. It seems from searching the various job sites that the predominant VOIP technology is not the applications-based open source approach we took, but Cisco, with a really heavy emphasis on the networking (ie network engineer) aspect. If you do a job search for (VOIP or Voice-over-IP or "IP telephony") and you mostly get results for network engineers with lo...

Hi, I'm looking at setting up a small production system - predominantly for voice mail and IVR (with a few extensions and hold music MP3's). I've found a couple of IBM X330 servers, with dual 1.13Ghz P3 processors. My question is; is a dual 1.13Ghz P3 server sufficient to run for real-life demands? I come from a Unix/Mac background, so I'm not swaye...

...amp;' or anything.) > > Jordan > > > On Jul 17, 2014, at 16:21 , David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > There seems to be some uncertainty about the use of smart pointers > > (previously OwningPtr, now std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr > > predominantly) in the LLVM project as a whole, so here's a thread to > > discuss/clarify/etc the project preferences/direction with regard to > > smart pointer usage. > > > > For some context, see discussions in LLVM r212403 and Clang r213307. > > > > The basic question...