search for: preconfiguring

Plan to use W2K PDC and a couple of Samba 2.2.8 file servers. Has anyone used the preconfigured templates that are shipped with W2K server(basicdc.inf, securedc.inf) on their PDC? Gotchas? Landmines? Necessary Modifications? Hudson __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!

On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Leaving all the implementation and interface details aside, this >>>> discussion is first of all about two fundamentally different

On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> Leaving all the implementation and interface details aside, this >>>> discussion is first of all about two fundamentally different

On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2015-09-01 18:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:34:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2015-09-01 18:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:34:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Leaving all the implementation and interface details aside, this >> discussion is first of all about two fundamentally different approaches: >> static shared memory windows vs. dynamically remapped shared windows (a >> third one would be copying in the

On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 09:35:21AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Leaving all the implementation and interface details aside, this >> discussion is first of all about two fundamentally different approaches: >> static shared memory windows vs. dynamically remapped shared windows (a >> third one would be copying in the

All, I'm trying to setup a network with some virtual machines, that can connect to each other and to the internet, but neither to the host nor to other VMs. Is there any preconfigured network filter or best-practice for this setup? Of course, I could setup iptables rules on the host, but I'd prefer libvirt to handle them. - Chris

On 2015-09-03 10:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:28:28PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 18:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:34:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On 2015-09-03 10:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:28:28PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2015-09-01 18:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:34:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:

On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Always Learning <centos at u64.u22.net> wrote: > >> There are probably still people that take their cars apart to check >> that they were assembled correctly too. > > Its about taking personal responsibility for the security of your > system(s). Trusting someone else's settings of what THEY think YOUR > security should be, is

...this error when I try to download Adobe: The installation or removal of a software package failed installArchives() failed: dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unable to create `/var/lib/dpkg/updates/tmp.i': Is a directory And this when I try to download Java: installArchives() failed: Preconfiguring packages ... Preconfiguring packages ... Preconfiguring packages ... dpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: unable to create `/var/lib/dpkg/updates/tmp.i': Is a directory So i was curious on if someone had a way to download Adobe/Java through WINE. I looked around, but was un-able to...

Hi, On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot. On my Slackware servers, I have a rather Keep-It-Simple approach to all things security, e. g. run no unneed services, open only needed ports etc. but I don't run the extra

Hi, This might be a silly question: which would be the best inode ratio for a 5 Tb filesystem dedicated to Maildir++ storage? I use ubuntu server, which has a preconfigured setting for mkfs.ext4 called "news" with inode_ratio = 4096, and after formating the fs with that setting and then with the defautl setting I see this difference of space (wasted space, but more inodes): 4328633696

On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:34:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:09:44PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2015-09-01 11:24, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:11:52AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> On 2015-09-01 10:01, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >

On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:21:28AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2015-09-03 10:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:28:28PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> On 2015-09-01 18:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:34:37PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>>> On 2015-09-01 16:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > > Le 21/08/2013 12:20, maximilian attems a ?crit : > >On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 07:44:39AM +0200, leroy christophe wrote: > >>Find attached two patches I have in order to build klibc 2.0.2 > >>against kernel 3.8.13 > >>We had to introduce those patches when going from kernel 3.6 to kernel 3.7

Hi, I could not find any option to set iSCSI initiator iqn while using guestfish, although the underlying qemu command has this option. It appears that each time guestfish tries to connect to iSCSI LUN, a randomly generated initiator iqn is being used. This is preventing guestfish to connect to the iSCSI target in our environment as the target allows incoming connection based on the preconfigured