search for: preconceived

...n that same side of the split opinions on the feature of returning rows with logical NA's as I am. I've learned to use `which`, and I push back when the conoscienti says it's not needed. After you read it a few more times you may come to a different opinion. Many people come to R with preconceived notions of what words like "equals" or "list" or "vector" mean and then complain about the documentation. You would be better advised to spend more time studying the language. The help pages are precise but terse, and you need to spend time with the examples and with o...

On 10/25/2017 4:38 AM, Ista Zahn wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 3:05 PM, BooBoo <booboo at gforcecable.com> wrote: >> This has every appearance of being a bug. If it is not a bug, can someone >> tell me what I am asking for when I ask for "x[x[,2]==0,]". Thanks. > You are asking for elements of x where the second column is equal to zero. > >

...gt; NUT is thoroughly documented with man pages and User Manual, but from my own experience it is not easy for Joe N00b to know what a working setup should look like in his case. To be honest, I am not sure that documenting these configurations will reduce the number of questions. Many people have preconceived notions of what NUT should do, based on what their current OS or vendor-provided software does (e.g. shut down after N minutes on battery). Perhaps the solution is to help map their configurations to NUT equivalents? > To address this, I propose a "NUT configuration for Noobs" which i...

Most of the questions asked in the nut-user mailing list seem to me to be either erudite technical discussion of new and exotic UPS units, or n00b questions of the style "I have this old UPS so I installed NUT but it didn't work". NUT is thoroughly documented with man pages and User Manual, but from my own experience it is not easy for Joe N00b to know what a working setup

...y documented with man pages and User Manual, but from >my own experience it is not easy for Joe N00b to know what a working >setup should look like in his case. > >To be honest, I am not sure that documenting these configurations will >reduce the number of questions. Many people have preconceived notions >of what NUT should do, based on what their current OS or >vendor-provided software does (e.g. shut down after N minutes on >battery). Perhaps the solution is to help map their configurations to >NUT equivalents? > >> To address this, I propose a "NUT configuration...

For those of you that either have an older revision of my firewall document, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the document is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.

I know this is a bit off topic but we are using Asterisk :) Since this list is full of tech gurus w/ all different sorts of backgrounds, I thought I would get the best opinions here. We have several different switches and other telecom equipment at our facilities which all have their own proprietary cdr platforms, which are rather limited. The company I work for is looking to develop their