search for: preatty

>I wonder how difficult it would be to rip off their modifications and revert to a.standard, functional nut. I think it should be preatty simple. just rename Synology files and replacewith what you think is the best there... it's just a banch of scripts nothing more...

is there a way to do element-by-element multiplication as in Gauss and MATLAB, as shown below? Thanks. --- a 1.0000000 2.0000000 3.0000000 x 1.0000000 2.0000000 3.0000000 2.0000000 4.0000000 6.0000000 3.0000000 6.0000000 9.0000000 a.*x 1.0000000 2.0000000 3.0000000 4.0000000

Hello, I am a Slackware user who's interested in learning CentOS. At this point it is for intellectual curiosity only and not for any real work so the machine need not be 100% stable at this point. It's most probably going to be an installation into VMWare. Given that, I thought I'd wait for 5-beta (mid-Jan'07) and start with that. Will it be possible to upgrade from 5-beta

I can't seem to get the read and write performance better than approximately 40MB/s on an ext2 file system. IMO, this is horrible performance for a 6-drive, hardware RAID 5 array. Please have a look at what I'm doing and let me know if anybody has any suggestions on how to improve the performance... System specs: ----------------- 2 x 2.8GHz Xeons 6GB RAM 1 3ware 9500S-12 2 x 6-drive,

So I finally got a test in after I changed my RPi to the master and everything else (including my Synology) to slaves.  Before I did that though, I timed the shutdown of my Synology since it is the slowest slave to shutdown.  It took 40 seconds to shutdown, so I changed HOSTSYNC in upsmon.conf on the master (“Proton”) to 60.  I then did a test ("sudo upsmon -c fsd”). The slaves shutdown, then

...e. B) you got HEAD instead of SAMBA_2:_" by mistake from cvs and tested with it. Solution: not many solutions come at hand, if you really need shares longer than 12 chars and you have to use NT to access them, you may try to find an head snapshot nearly the times when 2.2.0 came out. It was preatty stable at that time and supported >12 share names with NT, obviously it lacks the fixes that come with 2.2.1 so if you need them, better stay with 2.2.1 and find a way to have shares <13 chars. Simo. On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 10:33:40AM +0200, James Nord wrote: > Hi all, > > NT4.0...