search for: pranavk

...the above implementation is correct and should work fine. I initially thought that the above way is not the correct way anymore since 3.5.0 might have changed few things. Anyways here is my dirty code I have written for my research project that I took the above snippet from : https://github.com/pranavk/spatial-computing/blob/master/waves.cpp#L105 On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:25 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > This may be difficult yo reproduce or debug without a more complete > (though preferably minimal) test case. > On Feb 8, 2015 8:31 AM, "Pranav Kant&quo...

...gt;> I initially thought that the above way is not the correct way anymore >> since 3.5.0 might have changed few things. >> >> Anyways here is my dirty code I have written for my research project that >> I took the above snippet from : >> >> https://github.com/pranavk/spatial-computing/blob/master/waves.cpp#L105 >> > > Someone (not necessarily me) will presumably need the > input/command/arguments/whatever required to trigger the infinite loop in > this code that you're seeing, as well as the code there. > > >> >> >>...

void Wave::init (const Function &F){ Function::const_iterator ie = F.end(); outs() << ie << "\n\n"; for (Function::const_iterator I = F.begin(), IE = F.end(); I != IE; I++, K++){ outs() << I << "\n"; // some manipulation with I } } I used the above shown function in my pass in LLVM 3.4.2 and it used to work fine but