Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "pragmatists".
Did you mean:
pragmatist
2015 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] byval in a world without pointee types
Moving this to llvm-dev where I should've sent it in the first place (&
+Chandler, because we discussed this offline a bit)
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Rafael EspĂndola <
2003 Nov 12
3
[LLVMdev] Getting To Native Code
Let me add to one point that Misha made (just to show I actually read
these messages!)...
>>
>> Any ballpark ideas on when an alpha version could be available? Are we
>> talking months or years here?
>
> First of all, I would like to point out that the goal is *NOT* to
> compile Linux
> to run natively on your favorite architecture; instead, we aim to
> compile
2006 Aug 26
1
tripplite_usb
Is it me, or is my USB not being recognized properly?
tipper nut # ./tripplite_usb -DDD -u root -a tipper -x vendor=09AE
Network UPS Tools - Tripp Lite OMNIVS and SMARTPRO driver 0.6 (2.0.4)
Warning: This is an experimental driver.
Some features may not function correctly.
debug level is '3'
Checking device (0000/0000) (002/001)
- VendorID: 0000
- ProductID: 0000
- Manufacturer: Linux
2003 Nov 12
0
[LLVMdev] Getting To Native Code
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 11:45, Vikram Adve wrote:
> > This implies that it is not intended for end-user consumption but more
> > for a proof-of-concept and ongoing research potential.
>
> You're being too modest, Misha --- this is going to be the Linux of the
> future :)
>
I'll add my pragmatist $0.02 worth here. Take it with a grain of salt.
If LLVA isn't
2003 Nov 12
1
[LLVMdev] Getting To Native Code
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 04:05:20PM -0800, Reid Spencer wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 11:45, Vikram Adve wrote:
> > > This implies that it is not intended for end-user consumption but
> > > more for a proof-of-concept and ongoing research potential.
> >
> > You're being too modest, Misha --- this is going to be the Linux of
> > the future :)
>
>
2000 Mar 23
1
Some "new" stuff for hist.R
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.
--0-201145637-953833073=:7710
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Dear all,
I've been hacking on histograms the past couple of days. I wanted to do
two things, add
2009 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 16, 2009, at 5:51 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
>>
>> BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support.
>> I can see how that could be a problem for people.
>>
>> Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the
>> target get axed without considering my email/request...
2018 Aug 30
4
[FPEnv] FNEG instruction
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu>
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:51 PM, Stephen Canon <scanon at apple.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 29, 2018, at 1:22 PM, Cameron McInally via llvm-dev <
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> FSUB(-0.0, NaN) = NaN
>> FSUB(-0.0, -NaN) = NaN
>>
2009 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 16, 2009, at 2:30 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> BTW: I don't run Linux at all, so no Linux/ia64 support.
> I can see how that could be a problem for people.
>
> Anyway: my case is a weak one and I would understand if the
> target get axed without considering my email/request...
Hi Marcel,
There are two levels of problems with the IA64 backend. On the first
2009 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] Removal of IA-64 target
On Jul 16, 2009, at 9:49 PM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>> For us to keep IA64 around (and for it to be minimally useful for
>> your
>> work!), I think that the backend should pass most of the simple
>> programs in MultiSource/Benchmarks for example. It does *not* need
>> to
>> produce amazingly fast code, but the code needs to work. I don't
>>
2015 Mar 09
3
[LLVMdev] byval in a world without pointee types
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote:
> If we're keeping types on GEP,
>
You mean rather than just dropping gep entirely & doing manual pointer
arithmetic? (& moving inbounds to an attribute on pointer addition, I
guess?)
> then IMO we should keep them on allocas and globals. It keeps the IR human
> readable.
>
& what of
2005 Sep 16
8
Who is going to AstriCon (The Asterisk Conference)?
Hi,
I'm taking a straw-poll to see who out there is planning on going to
AstriCon. I would like to hear from both new members of the community
and gurus. What kinds of things would you like to see at an Asterisk
Conference? What topics are good BOF (Birds Of a Feather - informal
discussion group) fodder? What parts of Asterisk require the most
attention?
FYI - AstriCon is October 12 - 14
2008 Oct 29
5
network design philosophy and practice
I'm wondering how prevalent the practice of physically segregating voice
and data networks is in the Real World.
What are the factors that typically lead to such a decision?
DIscussions of pros and cons are most welcome by me.
Experiences, anybody?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3234
2011 Jun 07
7
text-mode system and /media
I'm running a headless server, so no GUI, just ssh logins. I don't seem to
have the mechanism that automounts USB drives to a subdirectory of /media,
and from googling around I think that's a feature of a GUI-based system.
What implements it? Right now I manually create a mountpoint in /mnt and
then manually mount by label from /dev/disk/by-label after plugging the
drive in. It
2007 Dec 04
10
Using puppet to manage user access to servers.
I''m guessing this is a common use case, but I wasn''t able to find
anything in the site FAQ. We''re looking at using Puppet on about 100
servers to control which user groups have access to which servers.
The use case is as follows:
We have Groups of servers, for example:
CUSTOMERservers (serverA, serverB, ...,serverK)
ADMINISTRATIVEservers