Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "prael".
Did you mean:
rael
2016 May 11
4
openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA
Hi,
Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
awaiting
the same for 6.7.
Thanks!
-->Pat
2016 May 11
5
openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA
On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said:
>
>> Hi,
>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
>> awaiting
>> the same for 6.7.
>>
>> Thanks!
> Looks like Red Hat...
2016 May 11
0
openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said:
> Hi,
> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
> awaiting
> the same for 6.7.
>
> Thanks!
Looks like Red Hat pushed it to RHEL v6.8, released ye...
2016 May 11
0
openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA
Patrick Rael wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com>
>> said:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for
>>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
>>> awaiting the same for 6.7.
>>>
>> Looks like Red...
2016 May 11
0
openssl Security Update for CentOS 6.7 ETA
On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote:
> On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com>
>> said:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update
>>> (CVE-2016-0799) for
>>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly
>>> awaiting
>>> the same for 6.7.
>...
2015 May 26
1
CVE-2014-4043 posix_spawn_file_actions_addopen
Hi,
Is there an ETA on when CVE-2014-4043 for glibc will be fixed in
centos.
I see the upstream vendor version glibc-2.20 has this fix supposedly, but
I don't see this specific fix in the centos glibc changelogs. I've
compiled the
test code for this bug and as of glibc-2.17.77 the test reports the bug
is present.
Preferably we'd like this fix on centos6.6 as we can't
2018 Oct 02
0
L1TF in CentOS
Hi,
????? I've applied the latest kernel upticks of kernel and
microcode_ctl for L1TF.
Just rpm updates and rebooted, no further changes.
kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64.rpm
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.noarch.rpm
kernel-headers-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64.rpm
perf-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64.rpm
microcode_ctl-1.17-33.3.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
L1TF has several mitigations.? So far I can see