search for: practially

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "practially".

Did you mean: practically
2004 May 13
2
FYI - Why RPMs are important
Someone emailed me directly when I was asking about the 8.0 RPMs, and why I didn't just compile it. Due to the production nature of our servers which run practially 24/7, I can do an "rpm -Uhv samba.rpm" and then do an "smb restart" with very little impact. If I move to non-rpm versions, I am forced to compile first, remove the RPM, which is a longer downtime, then install Samba and then turn Samba back on. Just FYI. *shrug* JMS
2004 Sep 22
2
SIP soft phones
Hello! Can anyone recommend a good/handy/nice sip soft phone? I have already done some testing with kphone and gnome meeting (which cant do sip).Can you recommend a open source project? It should mainly be practial and have a address book. I found kphone quite unstable, the address book is designed quite poor, and if you would like to transfer a call with the transfer button you cant access the
2009 Dec 22
2
Mirror of SAN Boxes with ZFS ? (split site mirror)
Hello, I''m thinking about a setup that looks like this: - 2 headnodes with FC connectivity (OpenSolaris) - 2 backend FC srtorages (Disk Shelves with RAID Controllers presenting a huge 15 TB RAID5) - 2 datacenters (distance 1 km with dark fibre) - one headnode and one storage in each data center (Sorry for this ascii art :) ( Data Center 1) <--1km--> (Data
2002 Jun 06
1
Re: Domain SID for BDC
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE wrote: > One thing that struck me today is the fact that if you copy the > secrets.tdb to another machine, smbd will generate a new SID for the > machine and hand this out on lsaquery. The only way to create a working > BDC with 2.2.5 is to manually generate a MACHINE.SID from the PDC with > rpcclient/lsaquery, copy this over to the BDC
1997 Nov 04
0
R-alpha: Re: Separation of Program & Doc ...
...ways connected to the Internet, it is not > PaulG> really clear that they always need and should be forced to have > PaulG> the help ... >This maybe practical in a future internet (or in today's net within >North-America?) where bandwidth of small files >like these is practially zero. Today, even getting only a thousand bytes can >take many seconds, which is too long. I am familiar with the low bandwidth problem and I appreciate that lots of people will want to install help files locally. For many people in North America the bandwidth is not so low anymore, and I am...
2010 Dec 14
2
300 dpi and eps:
Hi, I have a run of 5 graphs that I want to place them under the same page. Everything works fine to place them in a pdf file , or eps file, but when it comes to have a high quality of 300 dpi these graphs are not good. For example I open the eps file with Adobe Illustrator (AI) and it shows that it is a 72dpi graph. If I start with a 72dpi graph AI cannot improve this to 300 dpi. Q: HOW CAN A
2006 Apr 21
9
Capistrano, OS X
If you installed your copy of ruby via DarwinPorts, the hashbang lines at the top of your dispatch.* scripts says "#!/opt/local/bin/ruby". This is a problem, if you''re deployin via Capistrano to a host with a different path to ruby (which would be practially all of them:-) Here''s a fix. Add this "fix_hashbangs.rb" script to your script directory. Don''t forget to make it executable, and check it in to your Subversion repository. #!/usr/bin/env ruby current_path = ARGV[0] new_hashbang = ARGV[1] f_names = %w(dispatch.cgi...
2009 Apr 22
1
Tests for my gem cannot find classes in gems lib directory ..
I am writing a gem and using RSpec to drive my development. However, whenever I describe a class within the gems lib I get an uninitialized constant error. I am placing my folder structure, spec.rake and first spec below. I feel I must be missing something obvious. Additionally, I did output the value of f in lib inclusion code and it is traversing the lib folder correctly and I can
2000 Jan 27
6
EGD requirement a show stopper for me
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 17:34:10, Andre Lucas wrote: > Subject: /dev/urandom > On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 09:24:01AM -0700, SysProg - Nathan Paul Simons wrote: > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ben Taylor wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Max Shaposhnikov wrote: > > > > why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris? > > > > i think the