Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "practially".
Did you mean:
practically
2004 May 13
2
FYI - Why RPMs are important
Someone emailed me directly when I was asking about the 8.0 RPMs, and why I didn't just compile it. Due to the production nature of our servers which run practially 24/7, I can do an "rpm -Uhv samba.rpm" and then do an "smb restart" with very little impact. If I move to non-rpm versions, I am forced to compile first, remove the RPM, which is a longer downtime, then install Samba and then turn Samba back on.
Just FYI. *shrug*
JMS
2004 Sep 22
2
SIP soft phones
Hello!
Can anyone recommend a good/handy/nice sip soft phone?
I have already done some testing with kphone and gnome meeting (which cant
do sip).Can you recommend a open source project?
It should mainly be practial and have a address book.
I found kphone quite unstable, the address book is designed quite poor,
and if you would like to transfer a call with the transfer button you cant
access the
2009 Dec 22
2
Mirror of SAN Boxes with ZFS ? (split site mirror)
Hello,
I''m thinking about a setup that looks like this:
- 2 headnodes with FC connectivity (OpenSolaris)
- 2 backend FC srtorages (Disk Shelves with RAID Controllers presenting a huge 15 TB RAID5)
- 2 datacenters (distance 1 km with dark fibre)
- one headnode and one storage in each data center
(Sorry for this ascii art :)
( Data Center 1) <--1km--> (Data
2002 Jun 06
1
Re: Domain SID for BDC
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002 Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE wrote:
> One thing that struck me today is the fact that if you copy the
> secrets.tdb to another machine, smbd will generate a new SID for the
> machine and hand this out on lsaquery. The only way to create a working
> BDC with 2.2.5 is to manually generate a MACHINE.SID from the PDC with
> rpcclient/lsaquery, copy this over to the BDC
1997 Nov 04
0
R-alpha: Re: Separation of Program & Doc ...
...ways connected to the Internet, it is not
> PaulG> really clear that they always need and should be forced to
have
> PaulG> the help ...
>This maybe practical in a future internet (or in today's net within
>North-America?) where bandwidth of small files
>like these is practially zero. Today, even getting only a thousand
bytes can
>take many seconds, which is too long.
I am familiar with the low bandwidth problem and I appreciate that lots
of people will want to install help files locally. For many people in
North America the bandwidth is not so low anymore, and I am...
2010 Dec 14
2
300 dpi and eps:
Hi,
I have a run of 5 graphs that I want to place them under the same page.
Everything works fine to place them in a pdf file , or eps file, but
when it comes to have a high quality of
300 dpi these graphs are not good. For example I open the eps file with
Adobe Illustrator (AI) and it shows that it is a 72dpi graph. If I start
with a 72dpi graph AI cannot improve this to 300 dpi. Q: HOW CAN A
2006 Apr 21
9
Capistrano, OS X
If you installed your copy of ruby via DarwinPorts, the hashbang lines
at the top of your dispatch.* scripts says "#!/opt/local/bin/ruby". This
is a problem, if you''re deployin via Capistrano to a host with a
different path to ruby (which would be practially all of them:-)
Here''s a fix. Add this "fix_hashbangs.rb" script to your script
directory.
Don''t forget to make it executable, and check it in to your Subversion
repository.
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
current_path = ARGV[0]
new_hashbang = ARGV[1]
f_names = %w(dispatch.cgi...
2009 Apr 22
1
Tests for my gem cannot find classes in gems lib directory ..
I am writing a gem and using RSpec to drive my development. However,
whenever I describe a class within the gems lib I get an uninitialized
constant error. I am placing my folder structure, spec.rake and first
spec below. I feel I must be missing something obvious.
Additionally, I did output the value of f in lib inclusion code and it
is traversing the lib folder correctly and I can
2000 Jan 27
6
EGD requirement a show stopper for me
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 17:34:10, Andre Lucas wrote:
> Subject: /dev/urandom
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 09:24:01AM -0700, SysProg - Nathan Paul Simons wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Ben Taylor wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Max Shaposhnikov wrote:
> > > > why ssh1.27 doesn't requre /dev/urandom on solaris?
> >
> > i think the