search for: pr82

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr82".

Did you mean: pr2
2004 Apr 04
2
[LLVMdev] Two important changes to the getelementptr instruction
...l files and .bc files from earlier releases, as usual, will work fine with the newer version. In particular, we will always support .ll files that use ubyte indexes for structure types, as the parser auto-upgrades them to uint indexes. This change fixes the following bugs: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR82 http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR309 It also results in cleaner and simpler LLVM code, allowing many integer casts that were present for array indexes to go away. Though the encoding of getelementptr instructions is slightly less efficient than before (because we have to store what type the various sequ...
2004 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] Two important changes to the getelementptr instruction
...lier releases, as > usual, will work fine with the newer version. In particular, we will > always support .ll files that use ubyte indexes for structure types, as > the parser auto-upgrades them to uint indexes. > > This change fixes the following bugs: > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR82 > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR309 > > It also results in cleaner and simpler LLVM code, allowing many integer > casts that were present for array indexes to go away. Though the encoding > of getelementptr instructions is slightly less efficient than before > (because we have to st...
2004 Apr 05
1
[LLVMdev] Two important changes to the getelementptr instruction
...sual, will work fine with the newer version. In particular, we will > > always support .ll files that use ubyte indexes for structure types, as > > the parser auto-upgrades them to uint indexes. > > > > This change fixes the following bugs: > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR82 > > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/PR309 > > > > It also results in cleaner and simpler LLVM code, allowing many integer > > casts that were present for array indexes to go away. Though the encoding > > of getelementptr instructions is slightly less efficient than before &gt...