Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "pr6696".
2010 Apr 05
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.7 Pre-release1 available for testing
...ry).
Now in 2.7 the JIT crashes when running out of memory.
While that is a bug, I'm not sure if its part of the release criteria.
I tried to make some changes in MallocSlabAllocator to not crash, but
then FoldingSet crashed on OOM.
P.S.: looking at the current 2.7 release blockers I only see PR6696 as
relevant, the others are warnings, experimental code, and a fortran failure.
Is that the case, or are the others release blockers too?
Best regards,
--Edwin
2010 Mar 30
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] 2.7 Pre-release1 available for testing
On 03/30/2010 09:15 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing the release!
>
>> Tests were run on x86-64, Debian unstable, Linux 2.6.33, gcc 4.4.3,
>> 64-bit. I built srcdir == objdir, I have built llvm and clang myself,
>> and used the binaries for llvm-gcc.
>>
>> 1. llvm-gcc 2.7 vs 2.6
>> compared to my results from Aug 31 2009, ignoring CBE
2010 Apr 06
6
[LLVMdev] Call for Help: Testing
There was a short discussion in the comments of PR6696 about Linux
testing.
The 2.7 release is slipping primarily because there are x86-32 problems to
fix (there is also a Darwin problem and some other issues).
We have two problems with our testing:
The OSU/Google buildbots aren't running test-suite, apparently. I didn't
realize that and as...
2010 Apr 06
0
[LLVMdev] Call for Help: Testing
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:52 AM, David Greene wrote:
> There was a short discussion in the comments of PR6696 about Linux
> testing.
>
> The 2.7 release is slipping primarily because there are x86-32 problems to
> fix (there is also a Darwin problem and some other issues).
>
While lack of linux testing of the testsuite is a problem, this is not why the release is slipping. We need more pe...