Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr6019".
2010 Jan 13
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging
This patch adds a couple of interfaces to dump full or partial
SelectionDAGs. The current code only prints the top-level
SDNode. This patch makes it much easier to understand
CannotYetSelect errors and those sorts of things. In particular,
it helped me track down PR6019.
Any objections to committing?
-Dave
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: selectiondagdump.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 3807 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100113/86c...
2010 Jan 15
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging
...wrote:
> This patch adds a couple of interfaces to dump full or partial
> SelectionDAGs. The current code only prints the top-level
> SDNode. This patch makes it much easier to understand
> CannotYetSelect errors and those sorts of things. In particular,
> it helped me track down PR6019.
>
> Any objections to committing?
Ping?
-Dave
2010 Jan 15
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] SelectionDAG Debugging
...s patch adds a couple of interfaces to dump full or partial
>> SelectionDAGs. The current code only prints the top-level
>> SDNode. This patch makes it much easier to understand
>> CannotYetSelect errors and those sorts of things. In particular,
>> it helped me track down PR6019.
>>
>> Any objections to committing?
>
> Ping?
Is it ever desirable to pass false to the "limit" argument?
Otherwise this looks ok.
Dan