search for: pr548

...the future. >> >> >> Uhm, that's bad. Would it be possible to add it as a test program in our >> llvm-test suite? > > Well, as I said the current CVS version works fine, so this is good news. The > critical bugs that affected UCL miscompilation were PR491, PR548 and PR555, > all of which are fixed now. That's definitely good, but it seems like UCL is very good at exposing bugs in LLVM. :) To avoid this happening in the future, could you put together a simple test (like you are using to check for correctness) that we can use to test the compile...