Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "pr491".
2005 Apr 22
0
[LLVMdev] Need help with bugpoint for codegen problem
...sily in the future.
>>
>>
>> Uhm, that's bad. Would it be possible to add it as a test program in our
>> llvm-test suite?
>
> Well, as I said the current CVS version works fine, so this is good news. The
> critical bugs that affected UCL miscompilation were PR491, PR548 and PR555,
> all of which are fixed now.
That's definitely good, but it seems like UCL is very good at exposing
bugs in LLVM. :) To avoid this happening in the future, could you put
together a simple test (like you are using to check for correctness) that
we can use to test the...
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...ce/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_member
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method2
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640
SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc
SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest
SingleSource/Uni...
2005 Feb 14
0
LLVM February Status Update
...now supports -abs-tolerance and -rel-tolerance flags to debug
programs that emit floating point values which are allowed to be
slightly off (e.g. to treat 0.445 and 0.444 as the same).
Notable bugs fixed:
PR490: [cbackend] Logical constant expressions (and/or/xor) not implemented.
PR491: [dse] Dead Store Elimination deletes stores that are partially
overwritten by smaller stores.
PR487: llvm-gcc incorrectly rejects some constant initializers involving
the addresses of array elements.
PR501: llvm-g++ doesn't support C++ anonymous unions.
PR502: [llvm-g++...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ngleSource/Regression/C/casts | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-08-12-InlinerAndAllocas | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/matrixTranspose | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2004-02-03-AggregateCopy | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-06-13-Crasher | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C++/BuiltinTypeInfo...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | 0.0029 820 0.0030 * 0.0029 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | 0.0041 532 0.0014 * 0.0014 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0083 1464 0.0068 *...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0040 1324 0.0080 * 0.0080 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | 0.0040 496 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0040 1504 0.0080 *...
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0147 1316 0.0045 * 0.0070 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | 0.0048 528 0.0012 * 0.0011 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0074 1516 0.0112 *...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | 0.0011 852 0.0013 * 0.0015 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | 0.0010 448 0.0007 * 0.0006 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 | 0.0061 3488 0.0070 *...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
... 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 |
> 0.0000 588 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 |
> 0.0100 456 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 |
> 0.0100 2076 0.0100 ...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...- n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> PR1386 | 0.0000 588
> 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> PR491 | 0.0100 456
> 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> PR640 | 0.0100 2076
&g...
2007 Sep 15
22
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
LLVMers,
The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/
I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1
release. There are 2 ways you can help:
1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0
binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make
TEST=nightly report).
2) Download
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...02 81328 * * *
PpmdEncoder.ll 24 73540 0 0.02 73506 0 0.02 70726
PpmdHandler.ll 34 195865 0 0.02 195832 0 0.03 195832
PpmdRegister.ll 5 14936 0 0.01 14902 0 0.01 14902
PpmdZip.ll 18 67245 3 0.01 64946 3 0.01 64946
ppowmod.ll 1 11109 0 0.01 11082 0 0.01 11082
PR1386.ll 1 2570 0 0.01 2558 0 0.01 2558
PR491.ll 3 4997 0 0.01 4985 0 0.01 4985
PR640.ll 4 19066 0 0.01 19054 0 0.01 19054
prboard.ll 1 24762 0 0.01 24729 0 0.01 24729
prepair.ll 1 8790 0 0.01 8757 0 0.01 8757
preprocess.ll 1 12481 0 0.01 12451 0 0.01 12451
prestrict.ll 1 16735 0 0.01 16702 0 0.01 16702
primes.ll 9 14036 0 0.01 14005 0 0.01 14...