Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pr4542".
2009 Oct 20
4
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently
> though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do
> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account
> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string.
>
> Dan
>
>
So in the near futu...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Target data question
...opt" when a module doesn't have a target data specification? And
> does that mean that "opt", when given a module without a target data
> specification, might assume that GEP pointer-to-pointer, 1 should
> increment that pointer by eight bytes?
Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently
though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do
is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account
for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string.
Dan
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently
>> though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do
>> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account
>> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string.
>>
>> Dan
>>
&...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently
>> though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do
>> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account
>> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string.
>>
>> Dan
>>...
2009 Oct 20
3
[LLVMdev] Target data question
According to the "LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual":
When constructing the data layout for a given target, LLVM starts with
a default set of specifications which are then (possibly) overriden by
the specifications in the datalayout keyword. The default
specifications are given in this list:
* E - big endian
* p:32:64:64 - 32-bit pointers with 64-bit alignment
Are these
2009 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently
>>> though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do
>>> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account
>>> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string.
>>>
>>...