search for: pr4542

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pr4542".

2009 Oct 20
4
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Unfortunately, yes.  See PR4542.  Progress has been made recently > though -- the optimizers are now ready.  The main things left to do > is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account > for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string. > > Dan > > So in the near futu...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Target data question
...opt" when a module doesn't have a target data specification? And > does that mean that "opt", when given a module without a target data > specification, might assume that GEP pointer-to-pointer, 1 should > increment that pointer by eight bytes? Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string. Dan
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Kenneth Uildriks <kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >> Unfortunately, yes.  See PR4542.  Progress has been made recently >> though -- the optimizers are now ready.  The main things left to do >> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account >> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string. >> >> Dan >> &...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >> Unfortunately, yes. See PR4542. Progress has been made recently >> though -- the optimizers are now ready. The main things left to do >> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account >> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string. >> >> Dan >>...
2009 Oct 20
3
[LLVMdev] Target data question
According to the "LLVM Assembly Language Reference Manual": When constructing the data layout for a given target, LLVM starts with a default set of specifications which are then (possibly) overriden by the specifications in the datalayout keyword. The default specifications are given in this list: * E - big endian * p:32:64:64 - 32-bit pointers with 64-bit alignment Are these
2009 Oct 21
2
[LLVMdev] Target data question
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Kenneth Uildriks wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: >>> Unfortunately, yes.  See PR4542.  Progress has been made recently >>> though -- the optimizers are now ready.  The main things left to do >>> is to update the documentation and update the testsuite to account >>> for the change in the meaning of a module without a targetdata string. >>> >&gt...