Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr42319".
Did you mean:
42319
2020 Aug 30
3
Proposal to remove MMX support.
...e. But let's actually fix it.
*Existing bugs*:
llvm.org/PR35982 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35982> --
POSTRAScheduler disarrange emms and mmx instruction
llvm.org/PR41029 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41029> -- The __m64
not passed according to i386 ABI
llvm.org/PR42319 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42319> -- Add pass
to insert EMMS/FEMMS instructions to separate MMX and X87 states
llvm.org/PR42320 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42320> -- Implement
MMX intrinsics with SSE equivalents
*Proposal*
We should re-implement all the currently...
2020 Aug 31
2
Proposal to remove MMX support.
...ting bugs*:
>
> llvm.org/PR35982 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35982> --
> POSTRAScheduler disarrange emms and mmx instruction
>
> llvm.org/PR41029 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41029> -- The
> __m64 not passed according to i386 ABI
>
> llvm.org/PR42319 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42319> -- Add
> pass to insert EMMS/FEMMS instructions to separate MMX and X87 states
>
> llvm.org/PR42320 <https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42320>
> -- Implement MMX intrinsics with SSE equivalents
>
>
>
> *Proposal*
&...