Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr3795".
Did you mean:
pr3295
2009 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
On Apr 8, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
> From my experience, the ARM backend fails miserably on all except the
> most trivial uses of first class aggregates. For our project, this is
> a complete blocker on ARM platforms.
I'll try Dan's suggested fix for pr3795 "ARM assertion failure for
load of first-class aggregate from variable GEP". I'm not sure if
you're referring to that bug or if there are additional problems.
2009 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
2009/4/1 Robert Schuster <theBohemian at gmx.net>:
> Hi,
> the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I
> learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of
> LLVM is generally in its early stages of development.
>
> I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to
> be unstable and the like.
>
>
2009 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Hi,
the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I
learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of
LLVM is generally in its early stages of development.
I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to
be unstable and the like.
Thanks in advance for taking the time.
Regards
Robert
-------------- next part --------------
A