search for: pr3795

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr3795".

Did you mean: pr3295
2009 Apr 08
1
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
On Apr 8, 2009, at 9:52 AM, Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote: > From my experience, the ARM backend fails miserably on all except the > most trivial uses of first class aggregates. For our project, this is > a complete blocker on ARM platforms. I'll try Dan's suggested fix for pr3795 "ARM assertion failure for load of first-class aggregate from variable GEP". I'm not sure if you're referring to that bug or if there are additional problems.
2009 Apr 08
0
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
2009/4/1 Robert Schuster <theBohemian at gmx.net>: > Hi, > the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I > learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of > LLVM is generally in its early stages of development. > > I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to > be unstable and the like. > >
2009 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] What is the state of LLVM's ARM backend
Hi, the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of LLVM is generally in its early stages of development. I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to be unstable and the like. Thanks in advance for taking the time. Regards Robert -------------- next part -------------- A