Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr33502".
Did you mean:
pr33501
2017 Jun 17
3
My experience using -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED_COVERAGE to generate coverage
I've started looking at the state of code coverage recently; we figured
LLVM itself would be a good test to figure out how mature it is, so I
gave it a shot. My experience:
1. You have to specify -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=gold (or maybe lld works; I
didn't try). If you link with binutils ld, the program will generate
broken profile information. Apparently, the linked binary is missing
the
2017 Jun 19
3
My experience using -DLLVM_BUILD_INSTRUMENTED_COVERAGE to generate coverage
On 6/18/2017 3:51 PM, Vedant Kumar wrote:
>> My experience:
>>
>> 1. You have to specify -DLLVM_USE_LINKER=gold (or maybe lld works; I
>> didn't try). If you link with binutils ld, the program will generate
>> broken profile information. Apparently, the linked binary is missing
>> the __llvm_prf_names section. This took me half a day to figure out.